Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EC: tundra pong as a webtundra fork? #15

Open
tapanij opened this issue Jan 16, 2014 · 1 comment
Open

EC: tundra pong as a webtundra fork? #15

tapanij opened this issue Jan 16, 2014 · 1 comment

Comments

@tapanij
Copy link
Contributor

tapanij commented Jan 16, 2014

No description provided.

@antont
Copy link
Member

antont commented Jan 16, 2014

I have assumed it should not be a fork but just use webtundra as a library. like it does now, and for which the submodule setup is correct. and this is the general idea for all webtundra apps, or perhaps better said, web apps that use webtundra as a lib.

are there problems with current setup? would being a webtundra fork give some benefit?

projects that use e.g. jquery are typically not jquery forks either, same with three.js and all libs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants