is utils.losses redundant? #887
Philip1435
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 1 comment
-
Hi, thanks for the question, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I was working with Diceloss and found that there are two places it is written:
losses/dice
andutils/losses
. I used the latter one at first and did not get the outcome I expected, but then found success with the first one. I am here asking if there is any use forutils/losses
or is it actually redundant and someone forgot to clean it?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions