Move quickfixj-examples to separate repository

[chrjohn]

@david-gibbs-ig
What do you think about the version numbering when separating the example? Should it start with 1.0.0?

[david-gibbs-ig]

Yes I think that will be fine, its dependency on QFJ version or versions will be explicit and I think it can be decoupled from the QFJ version. For example you may not want to have to re-release it all for each minor release of QFJ.

[david-gibbs-ig]

It seems that it's possible to keep the (pruned) history of the existing examples. Probably you know this but I have never done it :-)
https://amandawalkerbrubaker.medium.com/splitting-your-git-repo-while-maintaining-commit-history-35b9f4597514

There are changes to the examples for FIX Latest so it would be good to keep them if we can.

[chrjohn]

@david-gibbs-ig thanks for the link. 👍 I didn't know it but I wanted to find out if that is possible since it would be good to keep the commit history.

[chrjohn]

@david-gibbs-ig
But I think that I need to increase the version number to the next major number (i.e. 3.0.0), otherwise it will probably cause problems when it's released under the same groupId and artifactId.

https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.quickfixj/quickfixj-examples-banzai

Do you agree? Changing the artifactId to something different might be unexpected.

[david-gibbs-ig]

@david-gibbs-ig But I think that I need to increase the version number to the next major number (i.e. 3.0.0), otherwise it will probably cause problems when it's released under the same groupId and artifactId.

https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.quickfixj/quickfixj-examples-banzai

Do you agree? Changing the artifactId to something different might be unexpected.

Yes I see what you mean. Well 3.0.0 is fine then and should match peoples' expectations, after this it can be versioned independently.