You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I quite like this rest-server project for its append-only feature and low complexity for a backup storage backend, but development seems to have stalled and while looking for alternatives, I found the rclone serve restic option that seems to work quite similar.
Is there still a reason to use rest-server over rclone serve restic or has rclone made this implementation obsolete?
Does the rclone command above actually work the same as rest-server?
Are there any plans to continue development of rest-server as an independent backend?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Are there any plans to continue development of rest-server as an independent backend?
There's no plan to abandon rest-server. But yes development has slowed to a crawl as I'm mostly focusing on restic at the moment.
Is there still a reason to use rest-server over rclone serve restic or has rclone made this implementation obsolete?
rest-server has additional features like verifying the checksum of uploaded files and more resilient error handling if rest-server fails for some reason.
I quite like this rest-server project for its append-only feature and low complexity for a backup storage backend, but development seems to have stalled and while looking for alternatives, I found the
rclone serve restic
option that seems to work quite similar.Is there still a reason to use rest-server over
rclone serve restic
or has rclone made this implementation obsolete?Does the rclone command above actually work the same as rest-server?
Are there any plans to continue development of rest-server as an independent backend?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: