Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backward jump by -2048 does not generate c.j #1647

Open
davidharrishmc opened this issue Dec 24, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Backward jump by -2048 does not generate c.j #1647

davidharrishmc opened this issue Dec 24, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@davidharrishmc
Copy link

davidharrishmc commented Dec 24, 2024

I have a backward jump of -2048 = 0x800. I expect RISC-V GCC would produce c.j -2048 (0xB001). Instead, it gives an uncompressed jump by -2048 (0x801ff06f).

Is this the intended behavior, or is there a code generation bug?

This can be reproduced with the following code. The unexpected uncompressed instruction is at 11804:

0000000000011800 <forward2048>:
   11800:	003100b3          	add	ra,sp,gp
   11804:	801ff06f          	j	11004 <back2048>


------ code

# cj.S
# Test case to illustrate GCC not generating compresed backward branches by -2048
# compile with
# riscv64-unknown-elf-gcc -march=rv64gc cj.S -o cj.elf
# riscv64-unknown-elf-objdump -D cj.elf > cj.elf.objdump

.global main

main: 
    j forward2048
.align 2
back2048:   
    j done

.align 11
forward2048: # address 80000800
    add x1, x2, x3 # dummy 4-byte instruction
    # j back2048 is a backward branch by a distance -2048 
    # I expect this should assemble into c.j -2048 (0xB001)
    # Instead, GCC gives  11804:	801ff06f          	j	11004 <back2048>
    j back2048

done:
    add x4, x5, x6
    
self_loop:
    j self_loop
@davidharrishmc
Copy link
Author

c.jal has the same behavior.

I would have expected this backward jal by 0x800 to produce machine language code 3001 rather than 801ff0ef.

80003800: 801ff0ef jal 80003000 <b11_c.jal>

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant