Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement facetting for vis_value(), vis_binary(), vis_compare(), vis_expect(), and vis_guess(). #159

Open
njtierney opened this issue Feb 2, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@njtierney
Copy link
Collaborator

See #78

@njtierney njtierney added this to the 0.7.0 milestone Feb 2, 2023
@njtierney njtierney modified the milestones: 0.7.0, 0.8.0 Apr 24, 2023
@Generalized
Copy link

Definitely, this would be extremely useful. The problem with predefined faceting rather than relying on the external +facet_grid or facet_rap is already visible in the SurvMiner package: it works as long as the user fits the anticipated pattern: max 2 groups. If one has 3 grouping variables - the facet_wrap or facet_grid becomes an unreachable dream. Then "patchworking" or gridExtra may help, but it's definitely a non-trivial solution. Such 2+ grouping is a daily thing e.g. in medical research, clinical trials, where we have multiple visits and multiple treatment arms (2 grouping levels). If one wants to look at missing data patterns in each treatment arm at each visit - then it has to be done with manual recreation of these graphs with ggplot2.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants