-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 99
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Tracking Issue - Team Update/Reorganization #434
Comments
CC @rust-embedded/all! |
Thanks James. Most I am active with respect to the Raspberrypi OS tutorials (mostly) and with For the For one, I could envision removing the cortex-a team and find other homes for said projects. In the past we briefly discussed if having a ”microprocessor” team makes more sense than distinct teams for architectures of specific vendors. If this is to be revisited then cortex-a can find a home there. Just some thoughts. Depends a lot on where the reorg is going. |
I can't speak for the rest of @rust-embedded/embedded-linux, but I've been lax on joining weekly meetings since most of the embedded linux work seems to be pretty orthogonal to bare-metal embedded work. I can certainly make a more concerted effort to attend if it would be valuable, although my professional embedded work will remain OS-bound. |
Could someone post here a list of teams and members, so we can see where we are at the moment? |
@jonathanpallant Not sure how to extract this information from https://github.com/orgs/rust-embedded/teams . There might be an API to do that but that requires setting up access tokens and might end up a bit annoying. |
You can't see that if you are not in a team it seems (this is my work account). |
This should be up-to-date: https://github.com/rust-lang/team/blob/master/teams/wg-embedded.toml |
re teams, this is what we have now:
|
Due to changes in company rules I cannot use working hours for not approved open-source projects and I don't have enougth personal spare time to hack on cortex-r devices. |
I've been on here since the start, but I only really deal with AVR stuff, of which there is very little on embedded-wg. That may change with avr-rust/rust-legacy-fork#161 however. I suspect my presence as some kind of admin of this repository may be getting in the way - I don't really interact with much on the embedded-wg because it isn't AVR related. I have no problems with my access being removed to make the process easier - I am not really a voting member. |
Hi. I don't have a very strong leg to stand on for this request given my mostly peripheral association with the cortex-a team (commentary not code) but I would request that the team be kept alive for 2 reasons:
Perhaps it might be an idea to simply consider looking at the existing cortex-a team list, checking to see if there has been any commits or commentary and on that basis simply asking the set of folks on that list if they a) Would like to remain members b) Provide a short blurb on how they feel they can provide value moving forwards and then move on that basis ? On my part, the areas that I can see myself contributing to directly moving forwards:
Thanks. |
In the meeting on 2020-03-24 (and in previous meetings), we discussed the following items:
In general, there seems to be interest in reorganizing the teams, and looking at the number of active members on each team.
We will have a meeting on 2020-03-31 focused on the structure of the team. If you have thoughts on the above topics, please make sure to make them known on this issue, or be present at the meeting that day.
We will be putting together a proposal which can then be put through the RFC process.
EDIT: updated scheduled meeting date to
2020-03-31
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: