You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
After adjusting the det_ext state as part of #824, a lot of lemmas were fixed to det_ext instead of the more general state_ext class. Some of these are required because they involved functions or properties that operate on the det_ext state, but many were changed just so that we didn't need to think about it, or accidentally as part of a larger crunch.
After adjusting the
det_ext
state as part of #824, a lot of lemmas were fixed todet_ext
instead of the more generalstate_ext
class. Some of these are required because they involved functions or properties that operate on thedet_ext
state, but many were changed just so that we didn't need to think about it, or accidentally as part of a larger crunch.It would be nice to go through and be more careful about which lemmas are made
det_ext
, as it will otherwise continue to spread throughout the proofs and be annoying whenever encountered. See https://github.com/corlewis/l4v/blob/1e732c8e3156eff3147ec165293d7aa7b8a66de7/proof/invariant-abstract/DetSchedDomainTime_AI.thy#L31 for an example where all of the lemmas in that locale were fixed todet_ext
, even though many didn't need to be.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: