Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question: Is VolumeSnapshotAPI capability implemented? #79

Open
achetronic opened this issue Aug 17, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Question: Is VolumeSnapshotAPI capability implemented? #79

achetronic opened this issue Aug 17, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@achetronic
Copy link

Hello there,
I just wanted to ask the question in the title.

In my opinion, the VolumeSnapshotAPI is useful over of SeaWeedFS, because the system is fault resilient, so you can trust the FS. But sometimes you need to start from a backup for some random reason (imagine your data are not corrupt or lost, but you literally broke a database), so having the CSI with VolumeSnapshotAPI capabilities, storing inside SeaWeedFS, but in another directory or whatever would be a great approach.

What do you think? Do you know a better approach to cover this type of cases in Kubernetes with SeaWeedFS?
(please, not Velero, that adds a lot of maintenance overhead sometimes)

Thank you!

@chrislusf
Copy link
Contributor

not implemented yet.

@achetronic
Copy link
Author

not implemented yet.

Ok, thank you

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants