Uninitialized constant Spree::ThemeSupport

[laurobecker]

I'm having the following problem. I'm quite new to Spree, but as I saw, is a Rails 3 compatibility problem.

/usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p320/bundler/gems/spree_scaffold-00131e5dc90b/lib/spree_scaffold_hooks.rb:1:in `<top (required)>': uninitialized constant Spree::ThemeSupport (NameError)
    from /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p320/gems/polyglot-0.3.3/lib/polyglot.rb:63:in `require'
    from /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p320/gems/polyglot-0.3.3/lib/polyglot.rb:63:in `require'
    from /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p320/bundler/gems/spree_scaffold-00131e5dc90b/lib/spree_scaffold.rb:3:in `<top (required)>'
    from /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p320@global/gems/bundler-1.3.4/lib/bundler/runtime.rb:72:in `require'
    from /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p320@global/gems/bundler-1.3.4/lib/bundler/runtime.rb:72:in `block (2 levels) in require'
    from /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p320@global/gems/bundler-1.3.4/lib/bundler/runtime.rb:70:in `each'
    from /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p320@global/gems/bundler-1.3.4/lib/bundler/runtime.rb:70:in `block in require'
    from /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p320@global/gems/bundler-1.3.4/lib/bundler/runtime.rb:59:in `each'
    from /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p320@global/gems/bundler-1.3.4/lib/bundler/runtime.rb:59:in `require'
    from /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p320@global/gems/bundler-1.3.4/lib/bundler.rb:132:in `require'
    from /Users/lauro/Documents/Desenvolvimento/Workspace/organica-digital/mystore/config/application.rb:7:in `<top (required)>'
    from /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p320/gems/railties-3.2.13/lib/rails/commands.rb:24:in `require'
    from /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p320/gems/railties-3.2.13/lib/rails/commands.rb:24:in `<top (required)>'
    from script/rails:6:in `require'
    from script/rails:6:in `<main>'

Thanks.

[sebastyuiop]

I'll have a look asap. Also, you might want to try this fork (https://github.com/siddart/spree_scaffold). It looks like they might have fixed it.

[laurobecker]

Great! The other branch generates the code properly. I'm having another problem though. I'll open another issue for that and keep this opened to be fixed. OK?

Thank you!