Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add option for local storage #39

Open
tio-trom opened this issue Jun 29, 2021 · 4 comments
Open

Add option for local storage #39

tio-trom opened this issue Jun 29, 2021 · 4 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested

Comments

@tio-trom
Copy link

Wouldn't be a good idea for a local storage option to be added? After all we are talking about notes, and relying on 2 separate servers for your notes I think can be overkill. First, rely on the server that provides the standard notes, then rely on a second one for storing the files.

@JaspalSuri JaspalSuri added enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested labels Jul 1, 2021
@JaspalSuri
Copy link

The local storage option would only be a good idea if it was a redundant option as some users often lose or wipe data that is stored locally (unless this is what you're already suggesting). Local storage also might only be a viable option for some platforms.

@tio-trom
Copy link
Author

tio-trom commented Jul 1, 2021

I was mainly thinking about attaching files to notes. Now it seems too complicated. What if each admin can setup a quota for users to prevent them from abusing the storage space?

@JaspalSuri
Copy link

This is something that we might add when we introduce a native way of attaching files that can be uploaded directly to our servers or (possibly) a self-hosted server.

@tio-trom
Copy link
Author

tio-trom commented Jul 5, 2021

That'd be really great!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants