Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Journal: Uses immature font (News Cycle) #1320

Open
Chealer opened this issue Dec 23, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Journal: Uses immature font (News Cycle) #1320

Chealer opened this issue Dec 23, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@Chealer
Copy link

Chealer commented Dec 23, 2024

Journal prefers the News Cycle font. This font generally looks nice in my opinion, but is unfortunately immature and its development is visibly stalled. The current version, 0.5.2, was released in 2015, and an important bug which was reported in 2012 persists.

To put it simply, this bug (displaying guillemets incorrectly) alone make News Cycle "unusable" in French, and probably in other major languages.

@thomaspark
Copy link
Owner

Thanks for the issue.

We should consider switching for a similar Gothic style font. For instance Gothic A1 seems to handle guillemets correctly.

Until the official update, the font can be overridden with the $web-font-path variable.

@Chealer
Copy link
Author

Chealer commented Dec 27, 2024

Oh, Gothic A1 indeed looks similar to News Cycle, which I like.

Thanks for the suggestion, but to clarify, guillemets are of course just one character among many which matter for Western languages. Gothic A1 does seem to handle guillemets fine, but the real problem reported here is general immaturity.
I do not know anything about Gothic A1, but Google Fonts suggests its popularity is similar to News Cycle's (low). More importantly, it does not seem to have a public source repository, nor a public ITS. I guess that amounts to making it even less mature than News Cycle. :-/

@thomaspark
Copy link
Owner

I see, that makes sense. I'll take nominations for a better font here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants