Replies: 2 comments 8 replies
-
Is that OMV? I don't own or maintain such 3rd party software so I can only speak to core mergerfs setups. If you wish to share your actual config and all the details I request in the support section of the docs then I might be able to help. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
8 replies
-
Please open a thread on the forum or an issue on github. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Maybe I am somehow stupid, but I added 5 drives to one mergerfs pool (OMV latest version, i attached a screenshot):
3x 16,7 TB
2x 2,7 TB
(sda1, sdb1, sdc1, sdd1, sdf1)
I did not setup any parity stuff and no snapraid and so on yet. Just one pool with those drives, mounted to /srv/mergerfs/data. The weird thing is, that it shows up with 22TB capacity, not 55TB as it should be... all drives are formatted, each individual drive shows up with correct size when i check df -h. But the pool size is off by 33TB.
Does anyone have a clue what is going on here?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions