We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
To make sure we're not regressing the parser, I suggest we run a smoke test for performance on PRs.
Basically as simple as
hyperfine 'tree-sitter parse scala/src/library/**/*.scala --quiet --time --stat'
I've run it on several past commits and it seems to be pretty stable:
Time (mean ± σ): 40.8 ms ± 1.0 ms [User: 39.4 ms, System: 1.4 ms] Range (min … max): 39.6 ms … 44.8 ms 71 runs
Time (mean ± σ): 41.1 ms ± 1.5 ms [User: 39.4 ms, System: 1.8 ms] Range (min … max): 39.5 ms … 48.5 ms 71 runs
Time (mean ± σ): 41.0 ms ± 1.6 ms [User: 39.1 ms, System: 1.9 ms] Range (min … max): 39.6 ms … 49.8 ms 71 runs
Time (mean ± σ): 40.3 ms ± 0.6 ms [User: 38.4 ms, System: 1.9 ms] Range (min … max): 39.4 ms … 43.5 ms 72 runs
Time (mean ± σ): 40.3 ms ± 0.6 ms [User: 38.1 ms, System: 2.2 ms] Range (min … max): 39.3 ms … 43.5 ms 72 runs
Time (mean ± σ): 41.4 ms ± 5.9 ms [User: 39.2 ms, System: 1.6 ms] Range (min … max): 39.9 ms … 90.2 ms 71 runs
Time (mean ± σ): 41.0 ms ± 3.2 ms [User: 38.8 ms, System: 1.8 ms] Range (min … max): 39.9 ms … 67.1 ms 71 runs
Time (mean ± σ): 40.6 ms ± 0.8 ms [User: 39.1 ms, System: 1.6 ms] Range (min … max): 39.6 ms … 44.5 ms 72 runs
Time (mean ± σ): 40.7 ms ± 0.6 ms [User: 38.6 ms, System: 2.2 ms] Range (min … max): 39.6 ms … 42.3 ms 70 runs
Time (mean ± σ): 40.6 ms ± 0.3 ms [User: 38.8 ms, System: 1.7 ms] Range (min … max): 39.9 ms … 41.6 ms 71 runs
Time (mean ± σ): 40.7 ms ± 0.8 ms [User: 39.2 ms, System: 1.4 ms] Range (min … max): 39.7 ms … 45.7 ms 70 runs
Time (mean ± σ): 40.6 ms ± 0.4 ms [User: 38.6 ms, System: 2.0 ms] Range (min … max): 39.8 ms … 42.4 ms 71 runs
Time (mean ± σ): 40.7 ms ± 1.6 ms [User: 39.0 ms, System: 1.6 ms] Range (min … max): 40.1 ms … 53.4 ms 71 runs
Time (mean ± σ): 41.4 ms ± 6.9 ms [User: 38.6 ms, System: 2.1 ms] Range (min … max): 39.7 ms … 98.9 ms 71 runs
Time (mean ± σ): 41.1 ms ± 4.1 ms [User: 38.8 ms, System: 1.8 ms] Range (min … max): 39.8 ms … 74.8 ms 71 runs
Time (mean ± σ): 41.1 ms ± 2.4 ms [User: 39.1 ms, System: 1.7 ms] Range (min … max): 39.7 ms … 58.3 ms 71 runs
Time (mean ± σ): 41.0 ms ± 2.8 ms [User: 38.8 ms, System: 2.0 ms] Range (min … max): 39.7 ms … 63.3 ms 69 runs
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
To make sure we're not regressing the parser, I suggest we run a smoke test for performance on PRs.
Basically as simple as
I've run it on several past commits and it seems to be pretty stable:
HEAD is now at 47767fc Merge pull request #135 from ckipp01/generationThrice
HEAD is now at 9cf2764 chore: generate latest changes
HEAD is now at fd05f09 Merge pull request #131 from eed3si9n/wip/instance
HEAD is now at 14a22e7 Add more test for instance_expression
HEAD is now at 77ea27e Fixes instance_expression
HEAD is now at 8677ff4 Creates a dummy node for import_selectors (#126)
HEAD is now at 94bb82c Merge pull request #125 from keynmol/export-clauses
HEAD is now at accc6c0 Output expected % regardless
HEAD is now at 94b7758 Export clauses
HEAD is now at 7d7fd07 Merge pull request #124 from eed3si9n/wip/guard
HEAD is now at 5b9b24d Merge pull request #122 from ckipp01/generateAgain
HEAD is now at 996b784 Fixes for expression
HEAD is now at c81b62f chore: generate latest changes
HEAD is now at cbf8207 Extra highlights for scala 3 constructs (#120)
HEAD is now at 24daf6e Merge pull request #118 from eed3si9n/wip/spec-correct
HEAD is now at 57a0e42 dotty/compiler/: expected 72, but got 71.99 instead
HEAD is now at 4bb8fab Don't use stable_identifier for imports
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: