Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

New rules regarding associations #19

Open
pedropaulofb opened this issue Dec 30, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

New rules regarding associations #19

pedropaulofb opened this issue Dec 30, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@pedropaulofb
Copy link
Collaborator

pedropaulofb commented Dec 30, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Regarding associations, two additional rules can be implemented:

  • verify class type (or at least evidence of it) using its relational dependency (cardinality at least one)
  • verify class type using their associations' types

Implementing these rules requires scope expansion, as currently only taxonomical and instantiation properties (rdfs:subClassOf and rdf:type, respectively) are currently within the software's scope.
@pedropaulofb pedropaulofb added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 30, 2022
@pedropaulofb pedropaulofb changed the title New rule regarding associations New rules regarding associations Dec 30, 2022
@pedropaulofb
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Add rule: If a class x is mandatorily related to another class y via a relation stereotyped as mediation, then x is not a Phase.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@pedropaulofb