You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Many of the INIT values (for base/standalone structs) will actually be all-zero, so equivalent to zero-initialization {}.
For those we could reduce the size of the header by just generating {} instead.
Should we have INIT macros when they are equivalent to zero-init, and therefore not really necessary? (see also "Abbreviate all-zero INIT macros as {0}? #423")
Keep for same reason
CF: Think we should not abbreviate. They're a form of documentation.
Many of the INIT values (for
base
/standalone
structs) will actually be all-zero, so equivalent to zero-initialization{}
.For those we could reduce the size of the header by just generating
{}
instead.INIT structs are issue #158, PR #422
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: