Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 1, 2022. It is now read-only.

There is no way to run GroupEx -> PEF integration from the admin panel. #2386

Open
ddrozdik opened this issue Jan 21, 2021 · 1 comment
Open
Labels
Daxko Related to Daxko integration Level: Advanced Complex task. Usually for Core team Severity: Normal Not critical, but still important. Selected for development. Status: Under discussion There is discussion in progress. More information to be provided soon Type: Docs Issues that are candidates for FAQ or documentation improvement Type: Enhancement Change request. New functionality.

Comments

@ddrozdik
Copy link
Contributor

Test Environment:
Environment: | https://sandboxes-d9.openy.org/
Open Y version | 8.x-2.8.0
Open Y installation type | Custom

Description:
At the moment, the module for GroupEx Pro -> PEF integration, https://github.com/ymcatwincities/openy/tree/9.x-2.x/modules/custom/openy_pef_gxp_sync provides a drush command only. However, if I need to run the sync from the admin panel, there is no way to do this.

This is an essential requirement for testing this integration because without it, for QA, there is no way to test integration on an Open Y build. It would also be beneficial for those who want to run sync without waiting when Cron will execute the Drush command.

@sarah-halby
Copy link
Collaborator

@podarok to create documentation on how to test without the integration (see the linked ticket).

cc @ddrozdik - we will work on the documentation linked here so that dev could test this item (rather than QA). Due to the upcoming Daxko API transition from GroupEx Pro, we need to determine whether or not this transition should be prioritized or if it will be solved by the Daxko transition.

@sarah-halby sarah-halby added Status: Under discussion There is discussion in progress. More information to be provided soon Daxko Related to Daxko integration Level: Advanced Complex task. Usually for Core team Severity: Normal Not critical, but still important. Selected for development. Type: Docs Issues that are candidates for FAQ or documentation improvement Type: Enhancement Change request. New functionality. labels Jan 26, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Daxko Related to Daxko integration Level: Advanced Complex task. Usually for Core team Severity: Normal Not critical, but still important. Selected for development. Status: Under discussion There is discussion in progress. More information to be provided soon Type: Docs Issues that are candidates for FAQ or documentation improvement Type: Enhancement Change request. New functionality.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants