Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

209 dev 1deg jra55do ryf #154

Draft
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: dev-1deg_jra55do_ryf
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

209 dev 1deg jra55do ryf #154

wants to merge 8 commits into from

Conversation

anton-seaice
Copy link
Contributor

Demon of new access-om3 build - see COSIMA/access-om3#209

@anton-seaice
Copy link
Contributor Author

!test repro commit

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

❌ The Bitwise Reproducibility Check Failed ❌

When comparing:

  • 209-dev-1deg_jra55do_ryf (checksums created using commit 1badb3c), against
  • dev-1deg_jra55do_ryf (checksums in commit 38c039f)

🔧 The checksums will be committed to this PR, as they differ.

Further information

The experiment can be found on Gadi at /scratch/tm70/repro-ci/experiments/access-om3-configs/1badb3c1d80fbccafeb7f9a01ec1d623d7d0c24e, and the test results at https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-om3-configs/runs/34691244534.

The checksums generated by this !test command are found in the testing/checksum directory of https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-om3-configs/actions/runs/12425020985/artifacts/2346700086.

The checksums compared against are found here https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-om3-configs/tree/38c039f4b87e6394ff54adde1986686195bb12e3/testing/checksum

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

❌ !test Command Failed ❌ There was a problem committing the result of the reproducibility run. See https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-om3-configs/actions/runs/12425020985

@anton-seaice
Turn on netcdf4 per COSIMA/access-om3#81
b69253e 
The new build uses openmpi4.1.7, which fixes some bugs preventing parallel reads over symlinks. This allows use of parallelio netcdf4 option, even though at this resolution for most components we will still only use one PE for IO.
@anton-seaice
Use .d and .m in CICE history output filenames
8fb3b60 
Per COSIMA/access-om3#201
@anton-seaice
use 'stop_option = end' as default restart write time
0d6f2ec
@anton-seaice
latest pre-release
cda1b44
@anton-seaice
Copy link
Contributor Author

!test repro commit

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

❌ !test Command Failed ❌ The command given could not be parsed correctly. Usage: !test TYPE [commit] See https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-om3-configs/actions/runs/12425780141

@anton-seaice
Copy link
Contributor Author

!test repro commit

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

✅ The Bitwise Reproducibility Check Succeeded ✅

When comparing:

  • 209-dev-1deg_jra55do_ryf (checksums created using commit cda1b44), against
  • dev-1deg_jra55do_ryf (checksums in commit 38c039f)
Further information

The experiment can be found on Gadi at /scratch/tm70/repro-ci/experiments/access-om3-configs/cda1b44f5810484016c92bf05b1759ab7b992d12, and the test results at https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-om3-configs/runs/34693177918.

The checksums generated by this !test command are found in the testing/checksum directory of https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-om3-configs/actions/runs/12425791642/artifacts/2346885858.

The checksums compared against are found here https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-om3-configs/tree/38c039f4b87e6394ff54adde1986686195bb12e3/testing/checksum

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@anton-seaice