ACCESS-OM3 QA Tests

[CodeGat]

In this PR:

• test_runconfig_ocn_cpl_dt_equals_runseq_coupling_timestep

Closes #52

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 40.00000% with 15 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 76.91%. Comparing base (0e91aec) to head (2c114ba).
Report is 9 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...rc/model_config_tests/qa/test_access_om3_config.py	40.00%	15 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #63      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   78.07%   76.91%   -1.17%     
==========================================
  Files          15       15              
  Lines         748      771      +23     
==========================================
+ Hits          584      593       +9     
- Misses        164      178      +14     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[anton-seaice]

I am not sure if this test is too prescriptive ?

e.g. it only looks at this line:

@3600

https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-om3-configs/blob/aab066584e21372e6e9546bc661fd395aae441c4/nuopc.runseq#L2

but we might want to configure this quite differently, there are lots of options:

https://earthsystemmodeling.org/docs/release/ESMF_8_3_1/NUOPC_refdoc/node4.html#SECTION000411300000000000000

[CodeGat]

What types of things are you looking to support, in that case? All of them? Just a subset, for now? Unless I'm reading the docs incorrectly, another way it can be written is:

@timeStep:runDuration
# @123:4000

And then something more confusing with nested timesteps.

[CodeGat]

I'll be away for the next couple of weeks, so I won't be able to finish this one. Would one of the people in your team be able to continue it, @anton-seaice ?
If it is eventually merged, one will have to update the config/ci.ymls model-config-tests-version section in access-om3-configs to 0.0.9.