Common - New: updatePerFrameHandlerDelay

[OverlordZorn]

When merged this pull request will:

New Function: cba_fnc_updatePerFrameHandlerDelay
New Function: cba_fnc_getPerFrameHandlerDelay

(Im happy to recieve suggestions re: function name)

[jokoho48]

this should maybe also update the next Execution time else the next time it executes, it would still execute based on the previous delay

[OverlordZorn]

this should maybe also update the next Execution time else the next time it executes, it would still execute based on the previous delay

could add a 3. param: _update next Execution time (bool) if its really needed, but i would need help to find figure out how.

[OverlordZorn]

15:56:20 "[CVO](debug)(TEST INIT) diag_tickTime: 432.1"
15:56:20 "Loop: 432.107"
15:56:21 "Loop: 433.107"
[...]
15:56:33 "Loop: 445.107"
15:56:34 "Loop: 446.109"
15:56:34 "[CVO](debug)(UpdateDelay) 1 -> 10 - diag_tickTime: 446.519"
15:56:35 "Loop: 447.107"
15:56:45 "Loop: 457.107"
15:56:55 "Loop: 467.107"
15:57:05 "Loop: 477.108"
15:57:10 "[CVO](debug)(UpdateDelay) 10 -> 1 - diag_tickTime: 482.759"
15:57:15 "Loop: 487.108"
15:57:16 "Loop: 488.107"
[...]

Hm... doesnt seem to take the desired effect?

nvm, i didnt set _updateExecutionTime to true :harold:

[OverlordZorn]

current version works as expected

16:43:39 "[CVO](debug)(TEST Start) _delay 1 - diag_tickTime: 99.727"
16:43:39 "Loop: 99.737"
16:43:40 "Loop: 100.737"
16:43:41 "Loop: 101.728"
16:43:42 "Loop: 102.737"
16:43:43 "Loop: 103.737"
16:43:44 "Loop: 104.728"
16:43:45 "Loop: 105.728"
16:43:46 "Loop: 106.728"
16:43:46 "[CVO](debug)(fnc_updatePerFrameHandlerDelay) _prvDelay: 1 - _newDelay: 10 - _prvDelta: 107.727 - _newDelta: 116.727 - _tickTime: 106.728"
16:43:56 "Loop: 116.737"
16:44:06 "Loop: 126.728"
16:44:09 "[CVO](debug)(fnc_updatePerFrameHandlerDelay) _prvDelay: 10 - _newDelay: 2 - _prvDelta: 136.727 - _newDelta: 129.728 - _tickTime: 129.728"
16:44:09 "Loop: 129.738"
16:44:11 "Loop: 131.738"
16:44:13 "Loop: 133.737"
16:44:15 "Loop: 135.738"
16:44:17 "Loop: 137.738"
16:44:19 "Loop: 139.738"
16:44:21 "Loop: 141.738"
16:44:23 "Loop: 143.739"
16:44:24 "[CVO](debug)(Test Stopped)diag_tickTime: 144.728"```

[OverlordZorn]

would cba_fnc_setPerFrameHandlerDelay be better then cba_fnc_updatePerFrameHandlerDelay ?