Update test_clip_tokens.py

[mrT23]

PR Type

Tests

---

Description

• Fixed a bug in the test case for clip_tokens function where the assertion was incorrectly checking if the clipped result equals the original text
• The test now correctly verifies that the clipped text should be different from the original text when applying token limits

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Tests	test_clip_tokens.py Fix incorrect assertion in clip tokens test                            tests/unittest/test_clip_tokens.py Modified assertion in test_clip method to expect result to be different from input text +1/-1

---

💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment /help "your question" on any pull request to receive relevant information

[qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪

🏅 Score: 95

🧪 PR contains tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ Recommended focus areas for review Test Coverage Consider adding test cases with edge cases like empty string input or max_tokens=0 to improve test coverage def test_clip(self): text = "line1\nline2\nline3\nline4\nline5\nline6" max_tokens = 25 result = clip_tokens(text, max_tokens) assert result != text max_tokens = 10 result = clip_tokens(text, max_tokens) expected_results = 'line1\nline2\nline3\n\n...(truncated)'

[qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

Category	Suggestion	Score
Possible issue	Test case should verify that input text within token limit remains unmodified rather than asserting inequality The assertion result != text is too broad and may miss edge cases. Instead, verify the specific behavior of clip_tokens() when the input text is within the token limit. tests/unittest/test_clip_tokens.py [11-14] text = "line1\nline2\nline3\nline4\nline5\nline6" max_tokens = 25 result = clip_tokens(text, max_tokens) -assert result != text +assert result == text, "Text within token limit should remain unchanged" Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 10 Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a critical issue where the test case is asserting the wrong behavior. When text is within token limits, clip_tokens() should return the original text unchanged, not modify it. This is a significant bug in the test logic.	10

• Author self-review: I have reviewed the PR code suggestions, and addressed the relevant ones.

[qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source]

CI Failure Feedback 🧐

(Checks updated until commit b073fb1)

Action: build-and-test

Failed stage: Test dev docker [❌]

Failed test name: TestClipTokens.test_clip

Failure summary: The test test_clip in TestClipTokens class failed because the clip_tokens function did not modify the input text as expected: The function was supposed to clip/truncate the text when given a max_tokens limit of 25 However, it returned the exact same text as the input ("line1\nline2\nline3\nline4\nline5\nline6") The test assertion assert result != text failed because the function didn't perform any clipping

Relevant error logs: 1: ##[group]Operating System 2: Ubuntu ... 1057: tests/unittest/test_find_line_number_of_relevant_line_in_file.py ...... [ 62%] 1058: tests/unittest/test_fix_output.py .... [ 67%] 1059: tests/unittest/test_github_action_output.py .... [ 72%] 1060: tests/unittest/test_handle_patch_deletions.py .... [ 76%] 1061: tests/unittest/test_language_handler.py ...... [ 83%] 1062: tests/unittest/test_load_yaml.py ... [ 87%] 1063: tests/unittest/test_parse_code_suggestion.py .... [ 91%] 1064: tests/unittest/test_try_fix_yaml.py ....... [100%] 1065: =================================== FAILURES =================================== 1066: ___________________________ TestClipTokens.test_clip ___________________________ 1067: self = <test_clip_tokens.TestClipTokens object at 0x7f0f2d809280> 1068: def test_clip(self): 1069: text = "line1\nline2\nline3\nline4\nline5\nline6" 1070: max_tokens = 25 1071: result = clip_tokens(text, max_tokens) 1072: > assert result != text 1073: E AssertionError: assert 'line1\nline2\nline3\nline4\nline5\nline6' != 'line1\nline2\nline3\nline4\nline5\nline6' 1074: tests/unittest/test_clip_tokens.py:14: AssertionError ... 1102: ../usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py:2317 1103: /usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py:2317: DeprecationWarning: Deprecated call to `pkg_resources.declare_namespace('azure')`. 1104: Implementing implicit namespace packages (as specified in PEP 420) is preferred to `pkg_resources.declare_namespace`. See https://setuptools.pypa.io/en/latest/references/keywords.html#keyword-namespace-packages 1105: declare_namespace(parent) 1106: ../usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/starlette/formparsers.py:12 1107: /usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/starlette/formparsers.py:12: PendingDeprecationWarning: Please use `import python_multipart` instead. 1108: import multipart 1109: ../usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_config.py:291 1110: /usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_config.py:291: PydanticDeprecatedSince20: Support for class-based `config` is deprecated, use ConfigDict instead. Deprecated in Pydantic V2.0 to be removed in V3.0. See Pydantic V2 Migration Guide at https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.8/migration/ ... 1182: pr_agent/tools/pr_reviewer.py 235 235 0% 1183: pr_agent/tools/pr_similar_issue.py 363 363 0% 1184: pr_agent/tools/pr_update_changelog.py 110 110 0% 1185: pr_agent/tools/ticket_pr_compliance_check.py 80 69 14% 1186: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1187: TOTAL 8922 7386 17% 1188: Coverage XML written to file coverage.xml 1189: =========================== short test summary info ============================ 1190: FAILED tests/unittest/test_clip_tokens.py::TestClipTokens::test_clip - Assert... 1191: ================== 1 failed, 85 passed, 15 warnings in 11.02s ================== 1192: ##[error]Process completed with exit code 1.

---

✨ CI feedback usage guide:

---

The CI feedback tool (/checks) automatically triggers when a PR has a failed check.
The tool analyzes the failed checks and provides several feedbacks:

• Failed stage
• Failed test name
• Failure summary
• Relevant error logs

In addition to being automatically triggered, the tool can also be invoked manually by commenting on a PR:

/checks "https://github.com/{repo_name}/actions/runs/{run_number}/job/{job_number}"

where {repo_name} is the name of the repository, {run_number} is the run number of the failed check, and {job_number} is the job number of the failed check.

Configuration options

• enable_auto_checks_feedback - if set to true, the tool will automatically provide feedback when a check is failed. Default is true.
• excluded_checks_list - a list of checks to exclude from the feedback, for example: ["check1", "check2"]. Default is an empty list.
• enable_help_text - if set to true, the tool will provide a help message with the feedback. Default is true.
• persistent_comment - if set to true, the tool will overwrite a previous checks comment with the new feedback. Default is true.
• final_update_message - if persistent_comment is true and updating a previous checks message, the tool will also create a new message: "Persistent checks updated to latest commit". Default is true.

See more information about the checks tool in the docs.