Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove uses of golang.org/x/exp/slices #32451

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pgimalac
Copy link
Member

What does this PR do?

Replace uses of golang.org/x/exp/slices in favor of std slices.

Motivation

golang.org/x/exp/slices does not contain any function that is not already available in slices, we should use the std version instead of the experimental version.

Describe how you validated your changes

CI should be enough.
Also added a depguard rule to avoid accidental imports.

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Additional Notes

@pgimalac pgimalac added changelog/no-changelog team/agent-shared-components qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests labels Dec 23, 2024
@pgimalac pgimalac requested review from a team as code owners December 23, 2024 11:20
@pgimalac pgimalac requested a review from GustavoCaso December 23, 2024 11:20
@github-actions github-actions bot added component/system-probe long review PR is complex, plan time to review it labels Dec 23, 2024
Copy link

Go Package Import Differences

Baseline: e6c945e
Comparison: 7cf596d

binaryosarchchange
cluster-agent-cloudfoundrylinuxamd64
+0, -1
-golang.org/x/exp/slices
cluster-agent-cloudfoundrylinuxarm64
+0, -1
-golang.org/x/exp/slices
dogstatsdlinuxamd64
+0, -2
-golang.org/x/exp/constraints
-golang.org/x/exp/slices
dogstatsdlinuxarm64
+0, -2
-golang.org/x/exp/constraints
-golang.org/x/exp/slices
process-agentlinuxamd64
+0, -1
-golang.org/x/exp/slices
process-agentlinuxarm64
+0, -1
-golang.org/x/exp/slices
process-agentwindowsamd64
+0, -2
-golang.org/x/exp/constraints
-golang.org/x/exp/slices
process-agentdarwinamd64
+0, -2
-golang.org/x/exp/constraints
-golang.org/x/exp/slices
process-agentdarwinarm64
+0, -2
-golang.org/x/exp/constraints
-golang.org/x/exp/slices
heroku-process-agentlinuxamd64
+0, -1
-golang.org/x/exp/slices
security-agentlinuxamd64
+0, -1
-golang.org/x/exp/slices
security-agentlinuxarm64
+0, -1
-golang.org/x/exp/slices
security-agentwindowsamd64
+0, -2
-golang.org/x/exp/constraints
-golang.org/x/exp/slices
system-probewindowsamd64
+0, -1
-golang.org/x/exp/slices
trace-agentlinuxamd64
+0, -2
-golang.org/x/exp/constraints
-golang.org/x/exp/slices
trace-agentlinuxarm64
+0, -2
-golang.org/x/exp/constraints
-golang.org/x/exp/slices
trace-agentwindowsamd64
+0, -2
-golang.org/x/exp/constraints
-golang.org/x/exp/slices
trace-agentdarwinamd64
+0, -2
-golang.org/x/exp/constraints
-golang.org/x/exp/slices
trace-agentdarwinarm64
+0, -2
-golang.org/x/exp/constraints
-golang.org/x/exp/slices
heroku-trace-agentlinuxamd64
+0, -2
-golang.org/x/exp/constraints
-golang.org/x/exp/slices

@louis-cqrl louis-cqrl removed the request for review from GustavoCaso December 23, 2024 11:43
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

Test changes on VM

Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:

inv aws.create-vm --pipeline-id=51725125 --os-family=ubuntu

Note: This applies to commit 7cf596d

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

Uncompressed package size comparison

Comparison with ancestor e6c945e2246e4144238c59dc5cb750311a783879

Diff per package
package diff status size ancestor threshold
datadog-dogstatsd-arm64-deb -0.02MB 55.75MB 55.77MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-rpm -0.02MB 113.39MB 113.41MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-suse -0.02MB 113.39MB 113.41MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-amd64-deb -0.02MB 113.32MB 113.34MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-arm64-deb -0.02MB 108.78MB 108.80MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-aarch64-rpm -0.02MB 108.85MB 108.87MB 10.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-rpm -0.04MB 78.61MB 78.65MB 10.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-suse -0.04MB 78.61MB 78.65MB 10.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-amd64-deb -0.04MB 78.53MB 78.57MB 10.00MB
datadog-heroku-agent-amd64-deb -0.04MB 504.84MB 504.88MB 70.00MB
datadog-agent-amd64-deb -0.06MB 1187.92MB 1187.97MB 140.00MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-rpm -0.06MB 1197.18MB 1197.24MB 140.00MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-suse -0.06MB 1197.18MB 1197.24MB 140.00MB
datadog-agent-arm64-deb -0.06MB 933.84MB 933.90MB 140.00MB
datadog-agent-aarch64-rpm -0.06MB 943.09MB 943.15MB 140.00MB

Decision

✅ Passed

Copy link

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: e6ee0f92-c995-40a2-aac1-096eb527f210

Baseline: e6c945e
Comparison: 7cf596d
Diff

❌ Experiments with missing or malformed data

This is a critical error. No usable optimization goal data was produced by the listed experiments. This may be a result of misconfiguration. Ping #single-machine-performance and we can help out.

  • file_tree (Logs)
  • otel_to_otel_logs (Logs)

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization +2.23 [-1.02, +5.47] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization +1.32 [+0.62, +2.01] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle memory utilization +0.69 [+0.65, +0.74] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput +0.66 [+0.60, +0.72] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput +0.47 [-0.32, +1.25] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput +0.07 [-0.68, +0.82] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 egress throughput +0.03 [-0.82, +0.88] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput +0.03 [-0.84, +0.89] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 egress throughput +0.03 [-0.93, +0.98] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.10, +0.11] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.01, +0.01] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput -0.02 [-0.79, +0.76] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency egress throughput -0.04 [-0.68, +0.60] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load egress throughput -0.29 [-0.75, +0.17] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization -1.21 [-1.31, -1.12] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard

Bounds Checks: ❌ Failed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 9/10 bounds checks dashboard
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs lost_bytes 10/10
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Failed. Some Quality Gates were violated.

  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 9/10 replicas passed. Failed 1 which is > 0. Gate FAILED.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog/no-changelog component/system-probe long review PR is complex, plan time to review it qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests team/agent-shared-components
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants