-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ruff: Add and fix Q000 #10095
Ruff: Add and fix Q000 #10095
Conversation
This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request. |
Conflicts have been resolved. A maintainer will review the pull request shortly. |
Hi there 👋, @DryRunSecurity here, below is a summary of our analysis and findings.
Note 🟢 Risk threshold not exceeded. Change Summary (click to expand)The following is a summary of changes in this pull request made by me, your security buddy 🤖. Note that this summary is auto-generated and not meant to be a definitive list of security issues but rather a helpful summary from a security perspective. Summary: The provided code changes cover a wide range of functionality within the Defect Dojo application, a web-based application vulnerability management tool. The changes span multiple modules, including the API, endpoint management, credential management, engagement management, finding management, and various utility functions. Overall, the code changes demonstrate a strong focus on security, with a emphasis on implementing robust authorization and access control mechanisms, secure data handling, and performance optimizations. The use of Django's built-in security features, such as input validation and sanitization, as well as the extensive use of authorization decorators and custom permission checks, suggest that security is a key priority in the development of this application. While the changes do not directly introduce any obvious security vulnerabilities, it is important to review the implementation details and the broader context of the application to ensure that there are no potential security risks or unintended consequences. This includes verifying the proper handling of sensitive data, the secure integration with external systems (e.g., JIRA), and the overall adherence to security best practices throughout the codebase. Files Changed:
Powered by DryRun Security |
This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request. |
Conflicts have been resolved. A maintainer will review the pull request shortly. |
This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request. |
Conflicts have been resolved. A maintainer will review the pull request shortly. |
This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request. |
This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request. |
Conflicts have been resolved. A maintainer will review the pull request shortly. |
DryRun Security SummaryThe provided code changes cover a wide range of functionality within the Defect Dojo application, including updates to security, reliability, and maintainability, with a focus on improving authorization, input validation, logging, and management of findings, credentials, endpoints, and engagements. Expand for full summarySummary: The provided code changes cover a wide range of functionality within the Defect Dojo application, including updates to the credential management, endpoint management, engagement management, finding management, and various other components. Overall, the changes appear to be focused on improving the security, reliability, and maintainability of the application. Key security-related enhancements include:
While the code changes do not appear to introduce any obvious security vulnerabilities, it's important to review the entire codebase and the application's architecture to ensure that there are no other potential security risks. Regular security assessments, penetration testing, and security monitoring are recommended to maintain the application's overall security posture. Files Changed:
Code AnalysisWe ran
Riskiness🟢 Risk threshold not exceeded. |
This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request. |
Conflicts have been resolved. A maintainer will review the pull request shortly. |
This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request. |
Conflicts have been resolved. A maintainer will review the pull request shortly. |
… kiuwan-sca # By dependabot[bot] (13) and others # Via GitHub * 'kiuwan-sca' of github.com:mwager/django-DefectDojo: (39 commits) Deprecate Python-jose and migrate okta to python_social_auth (DefectDojo#10117) fix: dockerfile warnings (DefectDojo#10505) Ruff: Add and fix Q000 (DefectDojo#10095) Fix(django): Upgrade of 4.2 (DefectDojo#10553) fix(deps): build python psycopg3 dependency instead of use the pre-build binary (DefectDojo#10491) Bump coverage from 7.5.4 to 7.6.0 (DefectDojo#10560) Bump asteval from 1.0.0 to 1.0.1 (DefectDojo#10561) Bump djangorestframework from 3.14.0 to 3.15.2 (DefectDojo#10431) Bump boto3 from 1.34.142 to 1.34.143 (DefectDojo#10558) Bump django-debug-toolbar from 4.4.5 to 4.4.6 (DefectDojo#10557) Bump boto3 from 1.34.141 to 1.34.142 (DefectDojo#10551) Bump packageurl-python from 0.15.2 to 0.15.3 (DefectDojo#10541) Bump boto3 from 1.34.140 to 1.34.141 (DefectDojo#10542) Update helm lock file Update versions in application files Update versions in application files API: Convert get_filterset calls to get_queryset (DefectDojo#10543) Bump django-debug-toolbar from 4.4.4 to 4.4.5 (DefectDojo#10527) Fix ruff Ruff fix ... # Conflicts: # dojo/settings/.settings.dist.py.sha256sum
PEP8 was fixed last year but there was not linter checking new findings.
This should fix and help for the future.
https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/#flake8-quotes-q