Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ruff: add and fix RET #10111

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 17, 2024
Merged

Ruff: add and fix RET #10111

merged 3 commits into from
Sep 17, 2024

Conversation

kiblik
Copy link
Contributor

@kiblik kiblik commented May 3, 2024

Copy link

dryrunsecurity bot commented May 3, 2024

Hi there 👋, @DryRunSecurity here, below is a summary of our analysis and findings.

DryRun Security Status Findings
Server-Side Request Forgery Analyzer 0 findings
Configured Codepaths Analyzer 0 findings
IDOR Analyzer 0 findings
Sensitive Files Analyzer 0 findings
SQL Injection Analyzer 0 findings
Authn/Authz Analyzer 62 findings
Secrets Analyzer 0 findings

Note

🟢 Risk threshold not exceeded.

Change Summary (click to expand)

The following is a summary of changes in this pull request made by me, your security buddy 🤖. Note that this summary is auto-generated and not meant to be a definitive list of security issues but rather a helpful summary from a security perspective.

Summary:

The code changes in this pull request focus on improving various security-related aspects of the DefectDojo application, including authorization and access control, input validation, error handling, and integration with external systems like JIRA and GitHub.

The changes involve refactoring and simplifying existing functions, enhancing the handling of user permissions and roles, improving the management of findings and endpoints, and strengthening the integration with issue tracking systems. These improvements help to ensure that the application is more secure, reliable, and maintainable.

While the changes do not introduce any obvious security vulnerabilities, it is important to continue reviewing the entire codebase and considering the broader context of the application to identify and address any potential security issues. This includes ensuring that input validation is robust, that sensitive data is properly protected, and that the application's security posture is regularly assessed and improved.

Files Changed:

  1. dojo/announcement/views.py: The changes focus on improving the user experience when dismissing an announcement, without introducing any apparent security concerns.
  2. dojo/api_v2/mixins.py: The changes simplify the delete_preview method, which does not seem to have any significant security implications.
  3. dojo/api_v2/permissions.py: The changes demonstrate a well-designed and comprehensive approach to implementing role-based access control, which is a crucial aspect of application security.
  4. dojo/apps.py: The changes are focused on improving the code quality and maintainability of the filtering functionality, which is an important aspect to review for potential security issues.
  5. dojo/api_v2/serializers.py: The changes include various validation checks, permissions management, and other security-related features that help to ensure the security and integrity of the API.
  6. dojo/cred/queries.py: The changes simplify the get_authorized_cred_mappings function, which is responsible for retrieving authorized credential mappings based on user permissions and roles.
  7. dojo/api_v2/views.py: The changes focus on improving the functionality and usability of the API, while also considering security-related aspects such as access control and data management.
  8. dojo/cred/views.py: The changes are aimed at improving the deletion process of credentials, ensuring that credentials are only deleted when they are not associated with any products, engagements, tests, or findings.
  9. dojo/authorization/authorization.py: The changes simplify the user_has_permission function, which is responsible for determining whether a user has the necessary permissions to perform a specific action on an object.
  10. dojo/decorators.py: The changes simplify the logic in the dojo_async_task, dojo_model_to_id, and dojo_model_from_id decorators, without introducing any obvious security concerns.
  11. dojo/endpoint/queries.py: The changes focus on improving the authorization logic for accessing authorized endpoints and endpoint statuses, which is a crucial aspect of application security.
  12. dojo/endpoint/utils.py: The changes address several improvements and bug fixes related to the handling of Endpoint objects, including the cleanup and migration of invalid or conflicting endpoint data.
  13. dojo/endpoint/views.py: The changes are focused on improving the functionality and user experience around endpoint management, without introducing any obvious security concerns.
  14. dojo/engagement/queries.py: The changes simplify the get_authorized_engagements function, which is responsible for retrieving a list of authorized engagements based on the user's permissions.
  15. dojo/finding/queries.py: The changes demonstrate a well-designed and secure approach to authorization management for findings, stub findings, and vulnerability IDs.
  16. dojo/filters.py: The changes improve the code quality and maintainability of the filtering functionality, which is an important aspect to review for potential security issues.
  17. dojo/engagement/views.py: The changes include the introduction of the ImportScanResultsView class, which is responsible for handling the import of scan results into the application. This is an area that requires careful review to ensure that it is properly secured.
  18. dojo/finding_group/queries.py: The changes simplify the get_authorized_finding_groups function, which is responsible for retrieving a queryset of Finding_Group objects that the current user is authorized to access.
  19. dojo/github_issue_link/views.py: The changes handle the creation of a new GitHub

Powered by DryRun Security

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented May 6, 2024

This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented May 6, 2024

Conflicts have been resolved. A maintainer will review the pull request shortly.

@kiblik kiblik closed this May 6, 2024
@kiblik kiblik reopened this May 6, 2024
@kiblik kiblik closed this May 6, 2024
@kiblik kiblik reopened this May 6, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request.

1 similar comment
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request.

Copy link
Contributor

Conflicts have been resolved. A maintainer will review the pull request shortly.

Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request.

Copy link
Contributor

Conflicts have been resolved. A maintainer will review the pull request shortly.

@kiblik kiblik closed this Sep 10, 2024
@kiblik kiblik reopened this Sep 10, 2024
@kiblik kiblik closed this Sep 10, 2024
@kiblik kiblik reopened this Sep 10, 2024
@mtesauro
Copy link
Contributor

@kiblik Starting to look good. Thanks for those other 2 PRs related to this one.

Once the Ruff stuff is fixed, I'm ready to approve and I suspect the other reviewers as well 👍

Copy link
Contributor

@mtesauro mtesauro left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved

Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request.

Copy link
Contributor

Conflicts have been resolved. A maintainer will review the pull request shortly.

Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request.

Copy link
Contributor

Conflicts have been resolved. A maintainer will review the pull request shortly.

@mtesauro
Copy link
Contributor

Closing to reopen - GHA are being weird today.

@mtesauro mtesauro closed this Sep 16, 2024
@mtesauro mtesauro reopened this Sep 16, 2024
@mtesauro mtesauro merged commit 22a0ffe into DefectDojo:dev Sep 17, 2024
79 of 90 checks passed
@kiblik kiblik deleted the ruff_ret branch September 17, 2024 15:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants