Fix Javadocs warnings #83
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
pom.xml (2)
316-316: LGTM! Enabling stricter Javadoc validation.Setting
failOnWarningsto true aligns with Issue #82's objective to enforce better documentation standards. This will help maintain high-quality documentation by failing the build when Javadoc warnings are present.Consider adding this change to your CI pipeline documentation to inform other developers about this stricter validation requirement.
Line range hint
583-607: LGTM! Well-structured version profiles with appropriate configurations.The new profiles for Vaadin 23 and 24 are correctly configured with appropriate Java versions and dependencies. The Jetty version update in the v24 profile is necessary for Java 17 compatibility.
Consider adding a comment in the profiles section documenting the purpose and requirements of each profile. For example:
<profiles> + <!-- Profile for Vaadin 23.x development (requires Java 11+) --> <profile> <id>v23</id> ... </profile> + <!-- Profile for Vaadin 24.x development (requires Java 17+ and Jetty 11+) --> <profile> <id>v24</id> ... </profile>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
pom.xml(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/orgchart/OrgChart.java(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/main/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/orgchart/OrgChart.java (1)
260-263: LGTM! Documentation and signature changes look correct.
The changes properly align the Javadoc with the actual implementation:
- The
@linktag now correctly referencesDragAndDropEvent - The parameter name is consistent with the method signature
- The event type matches the actual event being fired (defined in this file)
Let's verify that this is the only occurrence of the old event type name:
✅ Verification successful
The Javadoc and implementation are correctly aligned
The verification confirms that:
- The method signature in
OrgChart.javacorrectly usesComponentEventListener<DragAndDropEvent> DragAndDropEventis properly defined as an inner class inOrgChart.java- The test in
DragAndDropExportDemo.javauses the method correctly with a lambda expression
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to DragAndDropListener
rg "DragAndDropListener" --type java
Length of output: 312
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the usage context in the test file
rg -B 2 -A 2 "addDragAndDropListener" src/test/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/orgchart/DragAndDropExportDemo.java
Length of output: 286
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the method signature in OrgChart.java to confirm it's using ComponentEventListener<DragAndDropEvent>
rg -B 2 -A 2 "addDragAndDropListener.*ComponentEventListener" src/main/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/orgchart/OrgChart.java
# Also check if DragAndDropEvent is defined in the same file
rg "class DragAndDropEvent" src/main/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/orgchart/OrgChart.java
Length of output: 499
Close #81 & close #82
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
OrgChartclass for clarity, ensuring accurate terminology for drag-and-drop events.Chores