fix(compute): migrate region 'example' to 'compute_sendgrid' #9942
Conversation
|
Here is the summary of changes. You are about to add 2 region tags.
This comment is generated by snippet-bot.
|
product-auto-label
bot
added
the
api: compute
![code-review-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1008254?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi team,
I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will have a full review ready in a few minutes. In the meantime, here's a quick summary to get everyone up to speed:
This pull request, submitted by OremGLG, migrates the example region in the compute directory to compute_sendgrid. The primary goal is to formally associate this code with the SendGrid product. This addresses issue b/386956670.
Here's a breakdown of the changes:
compute/sendgrid/pom.xml: Added markers<!-- [START compute_sendgrid_dependecies_java] -->and<!-- [END compute_sendgrid_dependecies_java] -->around the SendGrid dependency declaration (lines 40-48).compute/sendgrid/src/main/java/com/example/compute/sendgrid/SendEmailServlet.java: Updated the code to include markers// [START compute_sendgrid]and// [END compute_sendgrid](lines 28 and 69). These markers wrap the existing// [START example]and// [END example]blocks.
The changes are straightforward and clearly improve the organization and clarity of the codebase by associating the code with the correct product.
And now, a little haiku to lighten the mood:
Regions shift and change,
Code finds its rightful product,
Clarity takes hold.
Let me know if you have any questions!
Best,
Gemini
product-auto-label
bot
added
the
samples
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This pull request migrates the 'example' region to 'compute_sendgrid' to officially associate it with a product. The changes are minimal and straightforward. The addition of the compute_sendgrid tags in pom.xml and SendEmailServlet.java clearly mark the code's association with the SendGrid product. I have a few minor suggestions for improvement, mostly related to documentation and consistency with Google Java Style Guide.
Summary of Style Guide References:
- Google Java Style Guide: Used as a general reference for Java code style and best practices. Specifically referenced for comment style and documentation practices.
Recommendations before Approval:
- Address the suggested documentation improvements in the review comments below.
- Ensure the checklist items in the pull request description are completed, especially running tests and linting the code.
- Update the README files to reflect the changes made in this pull request, explaining the usage of SendGrid and how it integrates with the compute product.
| @@ -37,13 +37,15 @@ | |||
| </properties> | |||
|
|
|||
| <dependencies> | |||
| <!-- [START compute_sendgrid_dependecies_java] --> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The comment <!-- [START compute_sendgrid_dependecies_java] --> appears to have a typo. Should it be dependencies instead of dependecies? Please correct this for consistency. This is per the Google Java Style Guide's recommendation for clear and accurate comments.
| <!-- [START compute_sendgrid_dependecies_java] --> | |
| <!-- [START compute_sendgrid_dependencies_java] --> |
| // [START compute_sendgrid] | ||
| // [START example] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's good practice to add a class-level Javadoc comment to explain the purpose of the SendEmailServlet class. This would improve the overall documentation and make the code easier to understand. For example:
/**
* Servlet for sending emails using SendGrid.
*/This adheres to the Google Java Style Guide's recommendations for class-level documentation.
| // [START compute_sendgrid] | |
| // [START example] | |
| /** | |
| * Servlet for sending emails using SendGrid. | |
| */ | |
| // [START compute_sendgrid] | |
| // [START example] |
| @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ | |||
| import com.sendgrid.helpers.mail.objects.Email; | |||
| import java.io.IOException; | |||
|
|
|||
| // [START compute_sendgrid] | |||
| // [START example] | |||
| public class SendEmailServlet { | |||
| static final String SENDGRID_API_KEY = "YOUR-SENDGRID-API-KEY"; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider adding a Javadoc comment to explain the purpose of the SENDGRID_API_KEY constant. Something like:
/** SendGrid API key. Replace with your actual API key. */This is in line with the Google Java Style Guide's recommendations for documenting constants.
| static final String SENDGRID_API_KEY = "YOUR-SENDGRID-API-KEY"; | |
| /** SendGrid API key. Replace with your actual API key. */ | |
| static final String SENDGRID_API_KEY = "YOUR-SENDGRID-API-KEY"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi team,
I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will have a full review ready in a few minutes. In the meantime, here's a quick summary to help you and other reviewers get up to speed:
This pull request, authored by OremGLG, aims to migrate the region identifier from 'example' to 'compute_sendgrid' within the java-docs-samples repository. This change is intended to formally associate the SendGrid sample code with the Compute Engine product. The intent is to improve organization and clarity within the sample codebase.
Here's a breakdown of the changes:
compute/sendgrid/pom.xml: Added comments to delineate the dependencies section for better readability. Specifically, lines 40-48 were modified to include<!-- [START compute_sendgrid_dependecies_java] -->and<!-- [END compute_sendgrid_dependecies_java] -->markers.compute/sendgrid/src/main/java/com/example/compute/sendgrid/SendEmailServlet.java: Updated the code to use the newcompute_sendgridregion identifier. This involved adding// [START compute_sendgrid]and// [END compute_sendgrid]comments on lines 28 and 69 respectively. The existing// [START example]and// [END example]comments remain.
The pull request addresses issue b/386956670.
I'll provide a more detailed review shortly.
A little poem to brighten your day:
Code flows like a river,
Bugs swim, a challenge to conquer,
Clean code, a clear stream.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This pull request migrates the 'example' region to 'compute_sendgrid', which is a good step towards better organization. The changes are straightforward and well-implemented. A few minor suggestions based on the Google Java Style Guide are included below. It's also important to update the README file to reflect these changes and ensure the checklist items regarding tests, linting, and static analysis are completed before merging.
| @@ -37,13 +37,15 @@ | |||
| </properties> | |||
|
|
|||
| <dependencies> | |||
| <!-- [START compute_sendgrid_dependecies_java] --> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Typo in the tag. Should be compute_sendgrid_dependencies_java. According to the Google Java Style Guide, comments should be clear and correct.
| <!-- [START compute_sendgrid_dependecies_java] --> | |
| <!-- [START compute_sendgrid_dependencies_java] --> |
| @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ | |||
| import com.sendgrid.helpers.mail.objects.Email; | |||
| import java.io.IOException; | |||
|
|
|||
| // [START compute_sendgrid] | |||
| // [START example] | |||
| public class SendEmailServlet { | |||
| static final String SENDGRID_API_KEY = "YOUR-SENDGRID-API-KEY"; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add a comment explaining the purpose of this constant, as recommended by the Google Java Style Guide for better readability. For example, // API key for SendGrid email service.
| static final String SENDGRID_API_KEY = "YOUR-SENDGRID-API-KEY"; | |
| static final String SENDGRID_API_KEY = "YOUR-SENDGRID-API-KEY"; // API key for SendGrid email service |
| // [START compute_sendgrid] | ||
| // [START example] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Since the example region tag is being replaced by compute_sendgrid, consider removing or updating the example tag to maintain consistency and avoid confusion. Following the Google Java Style Guide principle of keeping comments relevant and up-to-date.
| // [START compute_sendgrid] | |
| // [START example] | |
| // [START compute_sendgrid] | |
| // [END example] | ||
| // [END compute_sendgrid] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Since the example region tag is being replaced by compute_sendgrid, consider removing or updating the example tag to maintain consistency and avoid confusion. Following the Google Java Style Guide principle of keeping comments relevant and up-to-date.
| // [END example] | |
| // [END compute_sendgrid] | |
| // [END compute_sendgrid] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi team,
I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will have a full review ready in a few minutes. In the meantime, here's a quick summary to get everyone up to speed:
This pull request, submitted by OremGLG, migrates the example region in the compute directory to compute_sendgrid. The primary goal is to formally associate the SendGrid code samples with the appropriate product. This addresses issue b/386956670.
Here's a breakdown of the changes:
compute/sendgrid/pom.xml: Added comments to delineate the dependencies section for better readability. Specifically, lines 40-48 were modified to include<!-- [START compute_sendgrid_dependecies_java] -->and<!-- [END compute_sendgrid_dependecies_java] -->.compute/sendgrid/src/main/java/com/example/compute/sendgrid/SendEmailServlet.java: The comments// [START example]and// [END example]were updated to// [START compute_sendgrid]and// [END compute_sendgrid]respectively, on lines 28 and 69, to reflect the region change. This ensures consistency in the sample's documentation.
I'll be checking for any potential conflicts or unintended side effects during my full review.
And now, a little haiku to lighten the mood:
Code flows like a stream,
Reviews guide it to the sea,
Bugs are swept away.
Best,
Gemini
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This pull request migrates the 'example' region to 'compute_sendgrid' which is a good practice to associate code with a specific product. The changes are straightforward and generally well-structured. However, there are a few minor suggestions for improvement regarding consistency with Java conventions and documentation clarity. Also, the checklist mentions updating the README, but no README changes are included in this pull request. Please ensure the README is updated to reflect the changes made by this migration.
Summary of Style Guide Elements Referenced:
- Google Java Style Guide: Regarding comment placement for documentation tags.
| <!-- [START compute_sendgrid_dependecies_java] --> | ||
| <!-- [START dependencies] --> | ||
| <dependency> | ||
| <groupId>com.sendgrid</groupId> | ||
| <artifactId>sendgrid-java</artifactId> | ||
| <version>4.10.1</version> | ||
| </dependency> | ||
| <!-- [END dependencies] --> | ||
| <!-- [END compute_sendgrid_dependecies_java] --> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The added compute_sendgrid_dependecies_java tags in the pom.xml might be overly specific. While adding context-specific tags can be helpful for documentation, standard Maven practice typically uses the dependencies tag to encompass all dependencies. Consider simplifying the structure by removing these extra tags. This aligns better with common Maven conventions and reduces unnecessary complexity in the pom.xml.
| <!-- [START compute_sendgrid_dependecies_java] --> | |
| <!-- [START dependencies] --> | |
| <dependency> | |
| <groupId>com.sendgrid</groupId> | |
| <artifactId>sendgrid-java</artifactId> | |
| <version>4.10.1</version> | |
| </dependency> | |
| <!-- [END dependencies] --> | |
| <!-- [END compute_sendgrid_dependecies_java] --> | |
| <!-- [START dependencies] --> | |
| <dependency> | |
| <groupId>com.sendgrid</groupId> | |
| <artifactId>sendgrid-java</artifactId> | |
| <version>4.10.1</version> | |
| </dependency> | |
| <!-- [END dependencies] --> |
| // [START compute_sendgrid] | ||
| // [START example] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For better clarity and adherence to the Google Java Style Guide, consider placing documentation tags like [START compute_sendgrid] directly before the element they document. In this case, move the [START compute_sendgrid] tag to the line immediately preceding the class declaration. This improves readability and makes the association between the tag and the class clearer.
| // [END example] | ||
| // [END compute_sendgrid] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Similar to the previous comment, the [END compute_sendgrid] tag should ideally be placed immediately after the closing brace of the class it refers to. This clearly delineates the end of the documented section and improves consistency with the Google Java Style Guide.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi team,
I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will have a full review ready in a few minutes. In the meantime, here's a quick summary to get everyone up to speed:
This pull request, submitted by OremGLG, aims to migrate the region identifier from example to compute_sendgrid within the java-docs-samples repository. This change is intended to formally associate the SendGrid sample with the Compute Engine product, addressing issue b/386956670.
Here's a breakdown of the changes:
compute/sendgrid/pom.xml: Added<!-- [START compute_sendgrid_dependecies_java] -->and<!-- [END compute_sendgrid_dependecies_java] -->comments around the SendGrid dependency declaration (lines 40-48). This is a standard practice for code samples to clearly delineate sections.compute/sendgrid/src/main/java/com/example/compute/sendgrid/SendEmailServlet.java: The comments// [START example]and// [END example]have been updated to// [START compute_sendgrid]and// [END compute_sendgrid]respectively (lines 28-29 and 66-69). This ensures consistent and accurate labeling of the code snippets.
The changes are straightforward and well-documented. The PR author has followed the sample format guide and addressed the issue effectively. I'll provide a more detailed review shortly.
And now, a little haiku to lighten the mood:
Regions shift and change,
SendGrid finds its rightful place,
Code flows anew.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This pull request migrates the example region to compute_sendgrid, which is a good practice for associating code with specific products. The changes are generally well-structured and easy to understand. However, there are a few areas that could be improved:
- Incomplete Checklist: The pull request checklist is incomplete. Please ensure all items are addressed before merging, especially regarding README updates, dependency version checks, and test/lint verification. Provide details about any new APIs or environment variables required for testing.
- Dependency Management: While not directly part of this change, consider specifying the SendGrid dependency version using a property to manage it centrally. This can help with future updates.
- Security: Storing API keys directly in the code is a security risk. These should be managed through environment variables or a secrets management service.
- Documentation: While the code comments are helpful, ensure the README file is updated to reflect the changes introduced by this migration. This includes usage instructions and any setup steps specific to the
compute_sendgridregion.
| @@ -37,13 +37,15 @@ | |||
| </properties> | |||
|
|
|||
| <dependencies> | |||
| <!-- [START compute_sendgrid_dependecies_java] --> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider managing the SendGrid dependency version using a property. This allows for easier updates in the future and keeps the version consistent across the project. For example:
- Define a property in the
<properties>section:<sendgrid.version>4.10.1</sendgrid.version>
- Use the property in the dependency declaration:
<version>${sendgrid.version}</version>
This approach centralizes version management and improves maintainability. Please consider this best practice for future dependency management.
| @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ | |||
| import com.sendgrid.helpers.mail.objects.Email; | |||
| import java.io.IOException; | |||
|
|
|||
| // [START compute_sendgrid] | |||
| // [START example] | |||
| public class SendEmailServlet { | |||
| static final String SENDGRID_API_KEY = "YOUR-SENDGRID-API-KEY"; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Storing the SENDGRID_API_KEY directly in the code is a security risk. It's best practice to store sensitive information like API keys in environment variables or use a dedicated secrets management service. For environment variables, you can retrieve the key using System.getenv("SENDGRID_API_KEY"). This improves security and makes it easier to manage the key separately from the codebase.
| static final String SENDGRID_API_KEY = "YOUR-SENDGRID-API-KEY"; | |
| static final String SENDGRID_API_KEY = System.getenv("SENDGRID_API_KEY"); |
| @@ -37,13 +37,15 @@ | |||
| </properties> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As per the checklist item, please ensure the pom.xml parent is set to the latest shared-configuration version. This helps maintain consistency and provides the latest updates and bug fixes. Could you please confirm the latest version and update the dependency accordingly?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi team,
I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will have a full review ready in a few minutes. In the meantime, here's a quick summary to get everyone up to speed:
This pull request, submitted by OremGLG, aims to migrate the region identifier from example to compute_sendgrid within the java-docs-samples repository. This change is intended to formally associate the SendGrid code samples with the Compute Engine product. The intent is to improve organization and clarity within the sample codebase.
Here's a breakdown of the changes:
compute/sendgrid/pom.xml: Added markers<!-- [START compute_sendgrid_dependecies_java] -->and<!-- [END compute_sendgrid_dependecies_java] -->around the SendGrid dependency declaration (lines 40-48).compute/sendgrid/src/main/java/com/example/compute/sendgrid/SendEmailServlet.java: Updated comments to reflect the new region identifier. Specifically,// [START example]and// [END example]are now surrounded by// [START compute_sendgrid]and// [END compute_sendgrid](lines 28-29 and 66-69).
This PR addresses issue b/386956670.
The author has indicated that all tests and lint checks have passed.
A little poem for your coding pleasure:
From 'example' old and gray,
To 'compute_sendgrid' bright,
The code finds its way.
Let me know if you have any questions!
Best,
Gemini
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This pull request correctly migrates the sample from using example to compute_sendgrid region tags. The changes are minimal and straightforward. However, there are a few minor suggestions for improvement based on the Sample Format Guide you linked in the PR description.
It looks like you've checked off the "Appropriate changes to README are included in PR" checklist item, but I don't see any README changes in this PR. If there are README changes needed, please include them. If not, uncheck the box.
| @@ -37,13 +37,15 @@ | |||
| </properties> | |||
|
|
|||
| <dependencies> | |||
| <!-- [START compute_sendgrid_dependecies_java] --> | |||
| <!-- [START dependencies] --> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
According to the Sample Format Guide, the comment [START dependencies] should be removed. It looks like you added a new comment with the correct name (compute_sendgrid_dependecies_java), but didn't remove the old one. I recommend removing this comment since it's now redundant. Per the style guide, only one START/END comment pair should exist for a given code snippet.
| @@ -37,13 +37,15 @@ | |||
| </properties> | |||
|
|
|||
| <dependencies> | |||
| <!-- [START compute_sendgrid_dependecies_java] --> | |||
| <!-- [START dependencies] --> | |||
| <dependency> | |||
| <groupId>com.sendgrid</groupId> | |||
| <artifactId>sendgrid-java</artifactId> | |||
| <version>4.10.1</version> | |||
| </dependency> | |||
| <!-- [END dependencies] --> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
According to the Sample Format Guide, the comment [END dependencies] should be removed. It looks like you added a new comment with the correct name (compute_sendgrid_dependecies_java), but didn't remove the old one. I recommend removing this comment since it's now redundant. Per the style guide, only one START/END comment pair should exist for a given code snippet.
| @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ | |||
| import com.sendgrid.helpers.mail.objects.Email; | |||
| import java.io.IOException; | |||
|
|
|||
| // [START compute_sendgrid] | |||
| // [START example] | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
According to the Sample Format Guide, the comment [START example] should be removed. It looks like you added a new comment with the correct name (compute_sendgrid) above, but didn't remove the old one. I recommend removing this comment since it's now redundant. Per the style guide, only one START/END comment pair should exist for a given code snippet.
| @@ -65,3 +66,4 @@ public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException { | |||
|
|
|||
| } | |||
| // [END example] | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
According to the Sample Format Guide, the comment [END example] should be removed. It looks like you added a new comment with the correct name (compute_sendgrid), but didn't remove the old one. I recommend removing this comment since it's now redundant. Per the style guide, only one START/END comment pair should exist for a given code snippet.
Description
Migrate old 'example' region to 'compute_sendgrid' to officially associate it with a product.
Fixes b/386956670
Note: Before submitting a pull request, please open an issue for discussion if you are not associated with Google.
Checklist
pom.xmlparent set to latestshared-configurationmvn clean verifyrequiredmvn -P lint checkstyle:checkrequiredmvn -P lint clean compile pmd:cpd-check spotbugs:checkadvisory only