-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 604
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
修复签到逻辑bug,并使代码更灵活以适应签到好感度等级配置 #1604
Conversation
审核指南由 Sourcery 提供此拉取请求重构了登录逻辑,以修复错误并使代码更灵活,以适应登录印象级别配置。主要更改包括重写 文件级更改
提示Original review guide in EnglishReviewer's Guide by SourceryThis pull request refactors the sign-in logic to fix bugs and make the code more flexible to accommodate sign-in impression level configurations. The main changes include rewriting the File-Level Changes
Tips
|
请使用dev分支修改,并且保证bot运行检查通过 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
嗨 @McElaga - 我已经审查了你的更改 - 这里有一些反馈:
总体评论:
- 考虑用更优雅的错误处理机制替换配置一致性的断言,例如记录警告或引发自定义异常。这将防止整个插件因配置错误而失败。
这是我在审查期间查看的内容
- 🟢 一般问题:一切看起来都很好
- 🟢 安全性:一切看起来都很好
- 🟡 测试:发现1个问题
- 🟢 复杂性:一切看起来都很好
- 🟢 文档:一切看起来都很好
帮助我变得更有用!请点击每条评论上的 👍 或 👎 告诉我它是否有帮助。
Original comment in English
Hey @McElaga - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- Consider replacing the assertion for configuration consistency with a more graceful error handling mechanism, such as logging a warning or raising a custom exception. This would prevent the entire plugin from failing due to misconfiguration.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟡 Testing: 1 issue found
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ | |||
lik2level, | |||
lik2relation, | |||
) | |||
assert len(level2attitude)==len(lik2level)==len(lik2relation), '好感度态度、等级、关系长度不匹配!' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
suggestion (testing): 考虑增强断言错误信息,提供具体的长度信息
虽然这个断言对于确保一致性是好的,但如果错误信息包含每个列表的实际长度,将更有助于调试。这样,如果断言失败,将立即清楚哪些长度不匹配。
assert len(level2attitude)==len(lik2level)==len(lik2relation), '好感度态度、等级、关系长度不匹配!' | |
assert len(level2attitude) == len(lik2level) == len(lik2relation), ( | |
f'好感度态度、等级、关系长度不匹配!' | |
f'Lengths: attitude={len(level2attitude)}, ' | |
f'level={len(lik2level)}, relation={len(lik2relation)}' | |
) |
Original comment in English
suggestion (testing): Consider enhancing the assertion error message with specific length information
While this assertion is good for ensuring consistency, it would be more helpful for debugging if the error message included the actual lengths of each list. This way, if the assertion fails, it would be immediately clear which lengths don't match.
assert len(level2attitude)==len(lik2level)==len(lik2relation), '好感度态度、等级、关系长度不匹配!' | |
assert len(level2attitude) == len(lik2level) == len(lik2relation), ( | |
f'好感度态度、等级、关系长度不匹配!' | |
f'Lengths: attitude={len(level2attitude)}, ' | |
f'level={len(lik2level)}, relation={len(lik2relation)}' | |
) |
get_level_and_next_impression
函数,更好地整合了好感度等级最低和最高时的逻辑,并且在好感度等级最高时返回的next_impression
和impression
相等,与后续判断升级进度相契合(好感度等级最高时进度始终为100%);config.py
文件更改好感度等级相关配置时,签到功能仍然可用。Summary by Sourcery
重构印象级别逻辑以更有效地处理边缘情况,并确保与配置更改的兼容性。提高代码可读性并修复与印象级别计算相关的错误。
错误修复:
get_level_and_next_impression
函数中的逻辑,以正确处理最高印象级别,确保在达到最大级别时进度始终为100%。增强功能:
config.py
文件中印象级别配置的变化。Original summary in English
Summary by Sourcery
Refactor the impression level logic to handle edge cases more effectively and ensure compatibility with configuration changes. Improve code readability and fix bugs related to impression level calculations.
Bug Fixes:
get_level_and_next_impression
function to correctly handle the highest impression level, ensuring the progress is always 100% when the maximum level is reached.Enhancements:
config.py
file.