Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐳 chore(ci): 删除无用的ci #1798

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

AkashiCoin
Copy link
Collaborator

@AkashiCoin AkashiCoin commented Dec 24, 2024

Summary by Sourcery

CI:

  • 删除未使用的 CI 工作流配置文件 'bot_check.yml'。
Original summary in English

Summary by Sourcery

CI:

  • Remove unused CI workflow configuration file 'bot_check.yml'.

Copy link
Contributor

sourcery-ai bot commented Dec 24, 2024

Sourcery 审查指南

此拉取请求删除了一个未使用的 CI 工作流文件,具体来说是从 GitHub 工作流目录中删除了 bot_check.yml。

未生成图表,因为更改看起来很简单,不需要视觉表示。

文件级更改

更改 详情 文件
删除未使用的 CI 工作流文件。
  • 从 GitHub 工作流目录中删除了 bot_check.yml 文件。
.github/workflows/bot_check.yml

提示和命令

与 Sourcery 互动

  • 触发新审查: 在拉取请求中评论 @sourcery-ai review
  • 继续讨论: 直接回复 Sourcery 的审查评论。
  • 从审查评论生成 GitHub 问题: 通过回复审查评论请求 Sourcery 创建一个问题。
  • 生成拉取请求标题: 在拉取请求标题的任何地方写 @sourcery-ai 以随时生成标题。
  • 生成拉取请求摘要: 在拉取请求正文的任何地方写 @sourcery-ai summary 以随时生成 PR 摘要。您也可以使用此命令指定摘要应插入的位置。

自定义您的体验

访问您的仪表板以:

  • 启用或禁用审查功能,例如 Sourcery 生成的拉取请求摘要、审查指南等。
  • 更改审查语言。
  • 添加、删除或编辑自定义审查说明。
  • 调整其他审查设置。

获取帮助

Original review guide in English

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

The pull request removes an unused CI workflow file, specifically the bot_check.yml, from the GitHub workflows directory.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Removal of an unused CI workflow file.
  • Deleted the bot_check.yml file from the GitHub workflows directory.
.github/workflows/bot_check.yml

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
    this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Copy link
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@AkashiCoin - 我已经审查了你的更改 - 这里有一些反馈:

总体评论

  • 请在 PR 描述中提供更多关于为什么要移除此 CI 工作流的背景信息,并确认在项目中不再需要它。
这是我在审查期间查看的内容
  • 🟢 一般问题:一切看起来都很好
  • 🟢 安全性:一切看起来都很好
  • 🟢 测试:一切看起来都很好
  • 🟢 复杂性:一切看起来都很好
  • 🟢 文档:一切看起来都很好

Sourcery 对开源项目免费 - 如果你喜欢我们的评论,请考虑分享它们 ✨
帮助我变得更有用!请在每条评论上点击 👍 或 👎,我将使用反馈来改进你的评论。
Original comment in English

Hey @AkashiCoin - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

  • Please provide more context in the PR description about why this CI workflow is being removed and confirm that it's no longer needed anywhere in the project.
Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟢 General issues: all looks good
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants