This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 20, 2021. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
Discussion about middle management and product management
NewMexicoKid edited this page Sep 29, 2016
·
1 revision
- Be specific about context; companies can differ in different ways
- e.g., style, governance (traditional vs. modern)
- Middle management is given their own set of KPIs and objectives; their employees who are participating in inner source are, in a sense, diverting precious resources to activities that do not contribute to the middle management's KPIs. This pressure/disapproval can cause (some) employees to not engage in inner source contributions to other projects.
- Explain to middle management how it benefits their BU (some inner source projects may do so directly; but this advice may not otherwise hold).
- Good developers can move to where they do have permission and support to engage in inner sourcing.
- Give the middle management company wide KPIs and goals that inner sourcing contribute to so that the MM will support inner sourcing.
- Let MM take initiatives to make this work.
- Use their evil for good.
- Make MM a mentor or coach.
- Have upper management plan for 80% capacity rather than 100%.
- "It is the future of SW: inner sourcing will make your company more attractive to talent, it will be involved in something like open source, it will help retain people."
- Use concise, factual communication but include buzzwords
- Address MM fears
- Need to find the right language to talk with non-developers
- Think like a services company--invest in your people (through their inner source participation)
- "Can you afford to train them? Can you afford to train them and have them leave? Can you afford not to train them and have them stay?"
- Like with a sail boat, don't tack into the wind. Sometimes it is better to loosen your control for a while to avoid capsizing.
- Comment: Agile has self-organizing teams (like inner source)
- Completely self-organizing holocracy is possible (but has a lot of downsides)
- Eventually, what is the middle management role in inner sourcing? Inner source developers are self-organizing; do they really need much guidance from middle management?
- MM realign staff to new objectives
- What makes the company profitable? Would developers and MM know? (an argument that self-organizing may not be enough)
- Daniel Pink motivation; tell developers WHY should they do something. Extend the trust.
- 10% is only effective as a teaching exercise
- Let MM take a tour to see how it works first hand (essential if you want to make them a mentor or coach)
- 20% minimum participation
- 50% ore member
- tools and APIs, live demonstrators: inner sourcing is easier to do for innovation purposes; it is a perfect match for managing chaos.
- It is harder to ensure that SW is ready for real production release on a schedule.
- PdM enter a contract with penalties for non-delivery
- Delivery of content on time is key
- Do you control the # of engineers? Needed to promise content on time.
- Does project management work with inner sourcing?
- PjM ensure that the product is delivered on time.
- Can inner source work for product development? With visibility and the open collaboration model? Yes, there is a proof point from a large company.