Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Run actionlint in CI + make it available in dev shell #536

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 15, 2024

Conversation

smelc
Copy link
Contributor

@smelc smelc commented May 15, 2024

Changelog

- description: |
    Run actionlint in CI
# uncomment types applicable to the change:
  type:
  # - feature        # introduces a new feature
  # - breaking       # the API has changed in a breaking way
  # - compatible     # the API has changed but is non-breaking
  # - optimisation   # measurable performance improvements
  - refactoring    # QoL changes
  # - bugfix         # fixes a defect
  # - test           # fixes/modifies tests
  # - maintenance    # not directly related to the code
  # - release        # related to a new release preparation
  # - documentation  # change in code docs, haddocks...

Context

API version of the same feature in CLI. I thought I had added it, but no 😅

How to trust this PR

image

Checklist

  • Commit sequence broadly makes sense and commits have useful messages
  • Self-reviewed the diff

@smelc smelc force-pushed the smelc/run-actionlint-in-ci branch from 9837abc to c6e0895 Compare May 15, 2024 14:31
@smelc smelc marked this pull request as ready for review May 15, 2024 14:31
@smelc smelc requested review from Jimbo4350, newhoggy, carbolymer, palas and a team as code owners May 15, 2024 14:31
@smelc smelc added this pull request to the merge queue May 15, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 074114b May 15, 2024
26 checks passed
@smelc smelc deleted the smelc/run-actionlint-in-ci branch May 15, 2024 16:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants