Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bug fix: Fix function name typo in checkPeerDepedencies #6070

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ursulabauer
Copy link

I noticed a typo in the function name checkPeerDepedencies, where the word "Depedencies" should be "Dependencies." This typo could lead to confusion and potential errors in the codebase.

I’ve corrected it to checkPeerDependencies to ensure consistency and proper spelling. This change improves the clarity and maintainability of the code.

  • Because this PR includes a bug fix, relevant tests have been included.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 21, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
hardhat ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Dec 21, 2024 8:20pm

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Dec 21, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: fc6a3ac

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link
Member

@schaable schaable left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like this updates the function name but doesn’t update the calls to it. Could you update those as well to ensure everything works correctly?

@schaable
Copy link
Member

Closing in favor of #6078.

@schaable schaable closed this Dec 26, 2024
@ursulabauer
Copy link
Author

#6078

I sent it earlier.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants