-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 463
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
F/md shared example #2584
F/md shared example #2584
Conversation
ef4dbed
to
af7898c
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like there's an issue with the file naming for the MD_Shared
regression test. The test failed looking for FAST.Farm.out
, but it generated a FAST.Farm.FarmMD.MD.out
containing MoorDyn data.
Note: I added the |
@andrew-platt, lets chat next week about the initialization issue here. I have a suspicion about what's causing it |
Ready to merge
Feature or improvement description
This PR adds visualization of shared mooring lines from MoorDyn at the FAST.Farm level. This is a feature that several have requested.
Visualization of shared moorings is at the FAST.Farm timestep rate
NOTE: there are input files. There is a new line in the FAST.Farm input file for the
WrMooringVis
flag:Related issue, if one exists
None
Impacted areas of the software
Visualization from FAST.Farm only
Known issues with this PR
Test results, if applicable
New test case for two IEA 15 MW turbines in a shared mooring system. This case highlights that there is an issue with the initialization of the mooring lines (one turbine is rotated by 180 degrees, but this rotation is not factored into the initial relaxation calculations).
Figure 1: Turbine 1, on the left, has a platform rotation of 180 degrees. MoorDyn is calculating the initial relaxation of these mooring lines with the platform rotation of 0 degrees, so the lines do not render well on the first timestep.