Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: skip cves missing in mapping #72

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 24, 2024
Merged

Conversation

psegedy
Copy link
Member

@psegedy psegedy commented Sep 24, 2024

RHINENG-12773

@psegedy psegedy requested a review from jdobes September 24, 2024 14:05
Copy link

jira-linking bot commented Sep 24, 2024

Referenced Jiras:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHINENG-12773

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 25.00000% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 57.46%. Comparing base (86f6b90) to head (52c75e0).
Report is 43 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
vmaas/vulnerabilities.go 25.00% 4 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #72      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   56.74%   57.46%   +0.72%     
==========================================
  Files          11       11              
  Lines        2062     1949     -113     
==========================================
- Hits         1170     1120      -50     
+ Misses        838      758      -80     
- Partials       54       71      +17     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 57.46% <25.00%> (+0.72%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jdobes jdobes merged commit bfc8561 into RedHatInsights:main Sep 24, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants