Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix flaky test #27

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 27, 2024
Merged

Fix flaky test #27

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
3 changes: 3 additions & 0 deletions test/RadworksGovernor.t.sol
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ abstract contract Propose is ProposalTest {
// RAD_TOKEN handled specially as bravo upgrade changes RAD token balances
IERC20 _token = IERC20(RAD_TOKEN);
_assumeReceiver(_receiver);
vm.assume(_receiver != SCOPELIFT_ADDRESS);
uint256 _timelockTokenBalance = _token.balanceOf(TIMELOCK);

// bound by the number of tokens the timelock currently controls
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -232,6 +233,7 @@ abstract contract Propose is ProposalTest {
// @dev: RAD_TOKEN handled specially as bravo upgrade changes RAD token balances
IERC20 _token = IERC20(RAD_TOKEN);
_assumeReceiver(_receiver);
vm.assume(_receiver != SCOPELIFT_ADDRESS);

vm.deal(TIMELOCK, _amountETH);
uint256 _timelockETHBalance = TIMELOCK.balance;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -453,6 +455,7 @@ abstract contract Propose is ProposalTest {
// @dev: RAD_TOKEN handled specially as bravo upgrade changes RAD token balances
IERC20 _token = IERC20(RAD_TOKEN);
_assumeReceiver(_receiver);
vm.assume(_receiver != SCOPELIFT_ADDRESS);
uint256 _timelockTokenBalance = _token.balanceOf(TIMELOCK);

// bound by the number of tokens the timelock currently controls
Expand Down
Loading