Add info about MMLib.SwaggerForOcelot to notsupported.rst

[Burgyn]

Hi,

first of all, thank you for this great project and for actively taking care of it.

---

Many people are still looking for a way to aggregate their microservice documentation directly on the API Gateway. This is what my MMLib.SwaggerForOcelot project provides. I know it doesn't cover all scenarios like people use Ocelot, but a lot of it.
Many people use this package.

I prepared this PR so that people who are looking for a way to do it can find a solution faster. I will be happy if it gets into this documentation. However, I will understand if you reject this PR.

Thank you again.

[Burgyn]

Hi,

some acceptance test failed. But I'm not sure how this can be caused by a change in the documentation. I tried to find a connection, but in vain.

[Burgyn]

Hi @TomPallister ,

Please 🙏 can you check this PR?
Thanks.

[raman-m]

@Burgyn commented on Feb 12, 2021

Don't worry! The latest build is green! 😺

[raman-m]

Burgyn commented on Dec 29, 2022

I will check the PR!

Tom has no intention to develop this product because he was greatly inspired by Microsoft's YARP gateway in 2020. 🤣
Also, Tom has moved to another tech stack of Node.js and TypeScript. So, he has no much interest in leading his .NET project anymore.
This is the truth! And reality...

[raman-m]

Burgyn commented on Feb 5, 2021:

Many people are still looking for a way to aggregate their microservice documentation directly on the API Gateway. This is what my MMLib.SwaggerForOcelot project provides. I know it doesn't cover all scenarios like people use Ocelot, but a lot of it. Many people use this package.

Wow! I am impressed! So, cool package you've designed and built! 🥇

---

Burgyn/MMLib.SwaggerForOcelot | MMLib.SwaggerForOcelot.csproj

It uses Ocelot v18 which is .NET 6 release.
Do you have a plan to upgrade your project to .NET 7 and reuse Ocelot v19?
We have made .NET 7 release on April 23.

[raman-m]

I prepared this PR so that people who are looking for a way to do it can find a solution faster. I will be happy if it gets into this documentation. However, I will understand if you reject this PR.

We will not reject your request!
You just want to update the Not Supported section in docs.

Now I need to think about the right way we could move on...
Well...

• 1st, I don't like current Not Supported docs section. It is not structured well. It should be reviewed at least.
• 2nd, We have no sample web app for current instructions to enable Swagger being written by Tom. We could add a sample with default Swagger settings
• 3rd, your PR could have a new sample web app with the reference to your MMLib.SwaggerForOcelot package.

I believe, we need to convert this simple docs updating PR to real feature request, and work more on a sample. And sure we will update docs.

So, What about converting your PR to a feature request with more advanced description?

Any ideas are welcome!

[Burgyn]

Hi @raman-m,

thanks for your replays.

I will check the PR!
Tom has no intention to develop this product because he was greatly inspired by Microsoft's [YARP]> (https://github.com/microsoft/reverse-proxy) gateway in 2020. 🤣
Also, Tom has moved to another tech stack of Node.js and TypeScript. So, he has no much interest in leading his .NET project anymore.
This is the truth! And reality...

Yes I know about that. I understand his decision and I fully respect it.

Wow! I am impressed! So, cool package you've designed and built! 🥇

Thanks, it came out of necessity and people started using it 🙂.

It uses Ocelot v18 which is .NET 6 release.
Do you have a plan to upgrade your project to .NET 7 and reuse Ocelot v19?
We have made .NET 7 release on April 23.

Yes, I'm updating my project. I don't actively follow it, I only do it when someone notifies me. I will do it in the next few days.

So, What about converting your PR to a feature request with more advanced description?

It makes sense. I'll take a look at it and try to make a meaningful demo. It won't be right away though, I expect a couple of weeks before I get around to it.

[Burgyn]

Hi @raman-m

It uses Ocelot v18 which is .NET 6 release.
Do you have a plan to upgrade your project to .NET 7 and reuse Ocelot v19?
We have made .NET 7 release on April 23.

New version of my package with Ocelot 19 and .NET 7 was released.

[raman-m]

New version of my package with Ocelot 19 and .NET 7 was released.

Wow! This is just great news! Congrats! 🥳

---

Also, could you sync your fork please? Your forked repo is outdated (develop branch).
Or you can merge this PR 1 with rebase option.

[Burgyn]

Hi,

Also, could you sync your fork please? Your forked repo is outdated (develop branch).
Or you can merge this PR 1 with rebase option.

My forked repository is now up to date.

[raman-m]

My forked repository is now up to date.

Not yet! 😜
Your master branch is still behind ThreeMammals's one. 😉
I know master is not default branch now, but you could sync everything by Sync fork button.

[Burgyn]

Done 🙂

[raman-m]

@Burgyn commented on Jul 13

It makes sense. I'll take a look at it and try to make a meaningful demo. It won't be right away though, I expect a couple of weeks before I get around to it.

What about demo and sample app?
Do you have a time to contribute?
It seems it will be another PR for another feature branch...

[raman-m]

@raman-m commented on Aug 23

@Burgyn Hi Miňo!
I've asked you about a demo 2 months ago... No feedbacks from you!
Are you still with Ocelot?
Can we plan to develop this feature or close this PR?
I believe we could add a sample app to demonstrate the power of your library.

[Burgyn]

Hi @raman-m,
Sorry for the delayed response. I've been quite busy lately.

I plan to create a demo and probably submit it as a new PR sometime in December.
Thanks for your patience.

[raman-m]

We are waiting you returning to us back in December...

[raman-m]

Should care about #989 too via reopening... ☝️

[raman-m]

@Burgyn commented on Nov 1, 2023

Ah, it was in December '23, yet now it's June 2024. Do you plan to develop a sample project to showcase your library?

P.S. The feature branch has been rebased.