feat: combine services enterprise #6307
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
1 Ignored Deployment
|
![codescene-delta-analysis[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/53921?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Code Health Quality Gates: FAILED
- Declining Code Health: 2 findings(s) 🚩
- Improving Code Health: 0 findings(s) ✅
- Affected Hotspots: 0 files(s) 🔥
Recommended Review Level: Detailed -- Inspect the code that degrades in code health.
View detailed results in CodeScene
🚩 Declining Code Health (highest to lowest):
- Complex Method app.ts: getApp
- Complex Method server-impl.ts: createApp
| ): Promise<{ app: Application; services: unknown; stores: unknown }> { | ||
| let combinedServices = services; | ||
| let combinedStores = stores; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Getting worse: Complex Method
getApp already has high cyclomatic complexity, and now it increases in Lines of Code from 158 to 163
Why does this problem occur?
This function has many conditional statements (e.g. if, for, while), leading to lower code health. Avoid adding more conditionals and code to it without refactoring. Read more.
To ignore this warning click here.
| const { | ||
| app, | ||
| services: combinedServices, | ||
| stores: combinedStores, | ||
| } = await getApp(config, stores, services, unleashSession, db); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Getting worse: Complex Method
createApp already has high cyclomatic complexity, and now it increases in Lines of Code from 86 to 90
Why does this problem occur?
This function has many conditional statements (e.g. if, for, while), leading to lower code health. Avoid adding more conditionals and code to it without refactoring. Read more.
To ignore this warning click here.
FredrikOseberg
force-pushed
the
feat/combine-services-enterprise
branch
from
9b3d9fc to
cc454d8
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Code Health Quality Gates: FAILED
- Declining Code Health: 2 findings(s) 🚩
- Improving Code Health: 0 findings(s) ✅
- Affected Hotspots: 0 files(s) 🔥
Recommended Review Level: Detailed -- Inspect the code that degrades in code health.
View detailed results in CodeScene
🚩 Declining Code Health (highest to lowest):
- Complex Method app.ts: getApp
- Complex Method server-impl.ts: createApp
| @@ -35,7 +35,9 @@ export default async function getApp( | |||
| services: IUnleashServices, | |||
| unleashSession?: RequestHandler, | |||
| db?: Knex, | |||
| ): Promise<Application> { | |||
| ): Promise<{ app: Application; services: unknown; stores: unknown }> { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we have these as parametric types? Something like <EServices extends IUnleashServices, EStores extends IUnleashStores>
| ): Promise<{ app: Application; services: unknown; stores: unknown }> { | |
| ): Promise<{ app: Application; services: EServices; stores: EStores }> { |
| const { services: enterpriseServices, stores: enterpriseStores } = | ||
| config.preRouterHook(app, config, services, stores, db); | ||
|
|
||
| combinedServices = enterpriseServices; | ||
| combinedStores = enterpriseStores; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do we need to do this? I think the "beauty" of the getApp method is that it just return an app, and the preHook just modifies it
If we have to do that, I wouldn't call them enterpriseServices, I'd do something like:
const { services: extendedServices, stores: extendedStores } =
config.preRouterHook(app, config, services, stores, db);
More detailed information can be found in the unleash-enterprise repository.