Skip to content

Mautic Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published May 13, 2022 to the GitHub Advisory Database • Updated Apr 23, 2024

Package

composer mautic/core (Composer)

Affected versions

= 1.4.1

Patched versions

None

Description

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Mautic 1.4.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that (1) delete email campaigns or (2) delete contacts.

References

Published by the National Vulnerability Database May 10, 2017
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database May 13, 2022
Last updated Apr 23, 2024
Reviewed Apr 23, 2024

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

EPSS score

0.133%
(49th percentile)

Weaknesses

CVE ID

CVE-2017-8874

GHSA ID

GHSA-7vvh-xqq4-w777

Source code

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.