-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 215
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Merge pull request #2013 from priyashuu/policy-gradient-visualization
added policy-gradient-visualization
- Loading branch information
Showing
1 changed file
with
141 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,141 @@ | ||
--- | ||
id: policy-gradient-visualization | ||
title: Policy Gradient Methods Algorithm | ||
sidebar_label: Policy Gradient Methods | ||
description: "An introduction to policy gradient methods in reinforcement learning, including their role in optimizing policies directly for better performance in continuous action spaces." | ||
tags: [machine learning, reinforcement learning, policy gradient, algorithms, visualization] | ||
--- | ||
|
||
<Ads /> | ||
|
||
### Definition: | ||
|
||
**Policy Gradient Methods** are a class of reinforcement learning algorithms that optimize the policy directly by updating its parameters to maximize the expected cumulative reward. Unlike value-based methods that learn a value function, policy gradient approaches adjust the policy itself, making them suitable for environments with continuous action spaces. | ||
|
||
### Characteristics: | ||
- **Direct Policy Optimization**: | ||
Instead of deriving the policy from a value function, policy gradient methods optimize the policy directly by following the gradient of the expected reward. | ||
|
||
- **Continuous Action Spaces**: | ||
These methods excel in scenarios where actions are continuous, making them essential for real-world applications like robotic control and complex decision-making tasks. | ||
|
||
### How It Works: | ||
Policy gradient methods operate by adjusting the policy parameters $\theta$ in the direction that increases the expected return $J(\theta)$. The update step typically follows this rule: | ||
|
||
$$ | ||
\theta \leftarrow \theta + \alpha \nabla_\theta J(\theta) | ||
$$ | ||
|
||
where $\alpha$ is the learning rate and $\nabla_\theta J(\theta)$ represents the gradient of the expected reward to the policy parameters. | ||
|
||
### Problem Statement: | ||
Implement policy gradient algorithms as part of a reinforcement learning framework to enhance support for continuous action spaces and enable users to visualize policy updates and improvements over time. | ||
|
||
### Key Concepts: | ||
- **Policy**: | ||
A function $\pi_\theta(a|s)$ that defines the probability of taking action $a$ in state $s$ given parameters $\theta$. | ||
|
||
- **Score Function**: | ||
The gradient estimation used is known as the **likelihood ratio gradient** or **REINFORCE** algorithm, computed by: | ||
|
||
$$ | ||
\nabla_\theta J(\theta) \approx \sum_{t=1}^{T} \nabla_\theta \log \pi_\theta(a_t | s_t) G_t | ||
$$ | ||
|
||
where $G_t$ is the discounted return after time step $t$. | ||
|
||
- **Baseline**: | ||
To reduce variance in gradient estimation, a baseline (e.g., value function) is often subtracted from the return without changing the expected value of the gradient. | ||
|
||
### Types of Policy Gradient Algorithms: | ||
1. **REINFORCE Algorithm**: | ||
A simple Monte Carlo policy gradient method where updates are made after complete episodes. | ||
|
||
2. **Actor-Critic Methods**: | ||
Combine policy gradient methods (actor) with a value function estimator (critic) to improve learning efficiency by using TD (Temporal-Difference) updates. | ||
|
||
3. **Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO)**: | ||
A popular policy gradient approach prevents large updates to the policy by using a clipped objective function, enhancing stability. | ||
|
||
### Steps Involved: | ||
1. **Initialize Policy Parameters**: | ||
Start with random weights for the policy network. | ||
|
||
2. **Sample Trajectories**: | ||
Collect episodes by interacting with the environment using the current policy. | ||
|
||
3. **Calculate Returns**: | ||
Compute the total reward for each step in the trajectory. | ||
|
||
4. **Estimate Policy Gradient**: | ||
Calculate the policy gradient based on sampled trajectories. | ||
|
||
5. **Update Policy**: | ||
Adjust the policy parameters in the direction of the gradient. | ||
|
||
### Example Implementation: | ||
Here is a basic example of implementing a policy gradient method using Python and PyTorch: | ||
|
||
```python | ||
import torch | ||
import torch.nn as nn | ||
import torch.optim as optim | ||
import numpy as np | ||
|
||
# Simple policy network | ||
class PolicyNetwork(nn.Module): | ||
def __init__(self, input_dim, hidden_dim, output_dim): | ||
super(PolicyNetwork, self).__init__() | ||
self.fc1 = nn.Linear(input_dim, hidden_dim) | ||
self.fc2 = nn.Linear(hidden_dim, output_dim) | ||
|
||
def forward(self, x): | ||
x = torch.relu(self.fc1(x)) | ||
return torch.softmax(self.fc2(x), dim=-1) | ||
|
||
# Hyperparameters | ||
input_dim = 4 # Example state size (e.g., from CartPole) | ||
hidden_dim = 128 | ||
output_dim = 2 # Number of actions | ||
learning_rate = 0.01 | ||
|
||
# Initialize policy network and optimizer | ||
policy_net = PolicyNetwork(input_dim, hidden_dim, output_dim) | ||
optimizer = optim.Adam(policy_net.parameters(), lr=learning_rate) | ||
|
||
# Placeholder for training loop | ||
for episode in range(1000): | ||
# Sample an episode (code to interact with environment not shown) | ||
# Compute returns and policy gradients | ||
# Update policy parameters using optimizer | ||
pass | ||
``` | ||
|
||
### Visualization: | ||
Implementing visualizations can help observe how the policy changes over time, which can be done by plotting: | ||
- **Policy Distribution**: Display the action probabilities for given states over episodes. | ||
- **Rewards Over Episodes**: Track the cumulative reward to assess learning progress. | ||
- **Gradient Updates**: Visualize parameter updates to understand learning dynamics. | ||
|
||
### Benefits: | ||
- **Flexibility in Action Spaces**: | ||
Applicable to both discrete and continuous action spaces. | ||
|
||
- **Improved Exploration**: | ||
Direct policy optimization can lead to better exploration strategies. | ||
|
||
- **Stability Enhancements**: | ||
Advanced variants like PPO and Trust Region Policy Optimization (TRPO) add stability to policy updates. | ||
|
||
### Challenges: | ||
- **High Variance**: | ||
Gradient estimates can have high variance, making learning unstable without variance reduction techniques (e.g., baselines). | ||
|
||
- **Sample Inefficiency**: | ||
Requires many samples to produce reliable policy updates. | ||
|
||
- **Tuning**: | ||
Requires careful tuning of hyperparameters like learning rate and policy architecture. | ||
|
||
### Conclusion: | ||
Policy gradient methods provide a robust framework for training reinforcement learning agents in complex environments, especially those involving continuous actions. By directly optimizing the policy, they offer a path to enhanced performance in various real-world applications. |