-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 825
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
expose get_or_insert_key
and some optimization function for dict
#6876
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wonder if we're overloading more onto this builder than makes sense? If you're going to use unsafe to bypass the builder checks, you might as well just construct the dictionary array directly?
Sometimes I can't, I just have a function that gets the builder and need to append to it, also the builder make sure you don't insert duplicate values |
Right but you are just bypassing this with these methods?
And yet you know that it doesn't contain duplicate values? This feels exceedingly niche... |
It's not that it doesn't contain duplicate values, it's that I don't insert duplicate values (basically i need to append some indices from other dictionary so this will allow me to do what I did in |
Perhaps we might take a step back here and file a ticket with a concrete use-case, explaining what it is you're trying to achieve and we can then go from there. As it stands this PR dramatically increases the API surface without clear justification |
Which issue does this PR close?
None
Rationale for this change
I want to insert to dict without doing value lookup, this allow me to take advantage of some assumption I have about the data
What changes are included in this PR?
-
Are there any user-facing changes?
Yes, there are user facing changed and I think I documented them
TODO