Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Avail:0:1st Proposal:Integration of Avail DA layer with Arbitrum nitro #6

Closed
wants to merge 18 commits into from

Conversation

RISHABHAGRAWALZRA
Copy link
Collaborator

  • Addition of Avail package with having store and retrieve logic in das
  • Updation of nitro-contracts for support of avail header
  • Addition of Avail in replay binary for fraud proving in the Arbitrator

@RISHABHAGRAWALZRA RISHABHAGRAWALZRA self-assigned this Apr 10, 2024
LeafIndex uint64 `json:"leafIndex"`
LeafProof []gsrpc_types.Hash `json:"leafProof"`
RangeHash gsrpc_types.Hash `json:"rangeHash"`
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i have written a much cleaner version for this code in OP. Can you refer that and clean this file up a bit please.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will cover this in my next pr

if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to unmarshal bridge api response, err=%v", err)
}
t.Logf("%+v", bridgdeApiResponse)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we do some abstraction here, barely understandable in its current state

@RISHABHAGRAWALZRA RISHABHAGRAWALZRA deleted the avail-develop-v2.3.1 branch April 26, 2024 15:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants