You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi:
When I tried to calculate bias values using HiCKRy.py, I found there are some extreme values as like chr1 30875000 2043.101940700636 ; but the bias file generated by ICE normalization using HiCPro is normal, chr1 30875000 0.8739076476642095. My script is simple : python $KR -i $in -f $frag -o $bias
Meanwhile when I used the bias file generated by HiCKRy.py to finding inter-chromosomal significant interactions, I obtained too much interactions (5183320,q<0.01), but when I used ICE normalized bias file, I only obtained some interactions (493135,q<0.01).
It seems that the inter-chromosomal significant interactions from ICE normalization were more solid through comapred with contact heatmap using juicer.
Maybe I should choose the ICE normalization for calling inter-chromosomal significant interactions. Counld you give me some suggestions?
Best wishes
Qianzhao
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi Qianzhao,
There may be some stability issues with HiCKRy in some cases. This may be the case. Choosing to go with ICE or another KR implementation is logical.
Hi:
When I tried to calculate bias values using HiCKRy.py, I found there are some extreme values as like
chr1 30875000 2043.101940700636
; but the bias file generated by ICE normalization using HiCPro is normal,chr1 30875000 0.8739076476642095
. My script is simple :python $KR -i $in -f $frag -o $bias
Meanwhile when I used the bias file generated by HiCKRy.py to finding inter-chromosomal significant interactions, I obtained too much interactions (5183320,q<0.01), but when I used ICE normalized bias file, I only obtained some interactions (493135,q<0.01).
It seems that the inter-chromosomal significant interactions from ICE normalization were more solid through comapred with contact heatmap using juicer.
Maybe I should choose the ICE normalization for calling inter-chromosomal significant interactions. Counld you give me some suggestions?
Best wishes
Qianzhao
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: