Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Changes made in the MultisigBuilder contract, Added comments and improved code formatting #111

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Changes made in the MultisigBuilder contract, Added comments and improved code formatting #111

wants to merge 2 commits into from
+312 −291

Conversation

sergeypanin1994
Copy link

Changes made in the MultisigBuilder contract:

  1. Detailed Comments:

    • Added detailed explanations to each function, clarifying their purpose, parameters, and return values.
    • Improved inline comments to describe the logic and specific implementation details, making the code easier to understand.

  2. Code Formatting:

    • Standardized spacing and alignment across the file to improve visual clarity.
    • Grouped related operations logically to improve structure and flow.
    • Added consistent spacing between function definitions for better readability.

  3. Documentation Updates:

    • Provided a high-level summary at the top of the library to explain its overall purpose and usage.
    • Clarified the purpose of specific helper functions like appendRemainingBytes, genPrevalidatedSignature, and extractOwner.

  4. Logic Organization:

    • Enhanced the structure of the sortUniqueSignatures function for easier comprehension.
    • Organized loops and conditions more clearly for better maintainability.
    • Improved the error message for insufficient signatures to make debugging easier (require(j == threshold, "not enough signatures")).

  5. Console Logging:

    • Improved debug logs for skipped signatures, providing more detailed information about invalid or non-owner signatures.

    Added comments and improved code formatting

  • Added detailed comments to functions to clarify their purpose.
  • Improved the formatting of functions and events for better code readability.
  • Enhanced descriptions of steps (Step 1, Step 2, Step 3) to provide a clearer understanding of the contract's workflow.
  • Addressed potential issues with long lines to improve readability.

The code is now more structured and ready for further development.

Changes made in the MultisigBuilder contract:

1. Improved Documentation:

  • Added detailed comments to each function to explain its purpose, inputs, and outputs.
  • Clarified the logic behind sign, verify, simulate, and run steps for better understanding.
  • Enhanced readability of internal function _simulateForSigner and _overrides by providing context for their usage.

2. Formatting Enhancements:

  • Organized functions into logical sections with labeled dividers (e.g., Virtual Functions, Implemented Functions).
  • Improved indentation and alignment for better visual clarity.
  • Adjusted comments and docstrings to align with Solidity best practices for code documentation.

3. Refined Logic:

  • Ensured nonce function is more descriptive, clearly explaining its debugging role and limitations in production.
  • Improved _overrides function to clarify the sequence and purpose of combining simulation overrides with safe-specific overrides.

4. Consistency Improvements:

  • Ensured uniformity in naming conventions and parameter descriptions across all functions.
  • Standardized documentation format for public and internal functions.

5. Developer Experience:

  • Added explicit references to related contracts (IMulticall3, IGnosisSafe, Simulation) for easier integration and cross-referencing.
  • Highlighted potential risks and edge cases in functions like _simulateForSigner and _postCheck.

Summary:

These changes enhance the contract's maintainability, improve developer onboarding, and ensure the functionality is clear and well-documented for future iterations or audits.

feat: enhance readability, formatting, and documentation in Signatures library

Changes made:

  1. Detailed Comments:

    • Added detailed explanations to each function, clarifying their purpose, parameters, and return values.
    • Improved inline comments to describe the logic and specific implementation details, making the code easier to understand.

  2. Code Formatting:

    • Standardized spacing and alignment across the file to improve visual clarity.
    • Grouped related operations logically to improve structure and flow.
    • Added consistent spacing between function definitions for better readability.

  3. Documentation Updates:

    • Provided a high-level summary at the top of the library to explain its overall purpose and usage.
    • Clarified the purpose of specific helper functions like appendRemainingBytes, genPrevalidatedSignature, and extractOwner.

  4. Logic Organization:

    • Enhanced the structure of the sortUniqueSignatures function for easier comprehension.
    • Organized loops and conditions more clearly for better maintainability.
    • Improved the error message for insufficient signatures to make debugging easier (require(j == threshold, "not enough signatures")).

  5. Console Logging:

    • Improved debug logs for skipped signatures, providing more detailed information about invalid or non-owner signatures.

These changes improve the maintainability, readability, and usability of the library, making it more developer-friendly.

Mister_Omelette added 2 commits December 24, 2024 02:47
@smirnovslava189
feat: added detailed comments and improved documentation in the Multi…
0610fb6 
…sigBase contract

- Added comprehensive comments to functions and variables in the contract.
- Explained the logic for nonce handling, simulations, and signature processing.
- Clarified steps for transaction execution and validation.
- Improved code readability with explanations for critical components.
- Highlighted the importance of verifying data before signing and executing transactions.

This update enhances developer understanding and ensures safer usage of the MultisigBase contract.

feat: improve readability and add detailed comments to MultisigBuilder contract

- Added comprehensive comments to all functions, explaining their purpose and usage.
- Refined formatting for better code structure and readability.
- Enhanced clarity of function groupings with section dividers.
- Improved documentation for simulation and transaction execution steps.
- Ensured that SAFE_NONCE usage and simulation overrides are well-documented.

This update makes the code more maintainable and easier to understand for developers.

Added comments and improved code formatting

- Added detailed comments to functions to clarify their purpose.
- Improved the formatting of functions and events for better code readability.
- Enhanced descriptions of steps (`Step 1`, `Step 2`, `Step 3`) to provide a clearer understanding of the contract's workflow.
- Addressed potential issues with long lines to improve readability.

The code is now more structured and ready for further development.

feat: improve readability and documentation in the Signatures library

- Added detailed comments to all functions to clarify their purpose.
- Improved code formatting for better readability.
- Simplified understanding of the logic for signature processing and sorting.
@smirnovslava189
1. **Typos and grammatical errors**:
17c9bb8 
   - In the sentence:
     > "The HackerOne platform allows us to have a centralized and single reporting source for us to deliver optimized SLA's and results."
     The term **"SLA's"** is incorrectly written with an apostrophe. It should be updated to **SLAs**.
   - In the phrase:
     > "assuring the best quality of review."
     The wording can be improved for clarity and conciseness by changing it to **"ensuring high-quality reviews"**.

2. **Markdown issues**:
   - The reference **[3]** is not used in the text. If it is unnecessary, consider removing it.

3. **Text formatting**:
   - The first line under "Bug bounty program" is quite long. Breaking it into multiple lines would improve readability:
     ```markdown
     Coinbase is extending our [best-in-industry][1] million-dollar
     [HackerOne bug bounty program][2] to cover the Base network,
     the Base bridge contracts, and Base infrastructure.
     ```
   - The technical term **"SLA's"** should be written as **SLAs** without quotes or an apostrophe for consistency.
@cb-heimdall
Copy link
Collaborator

🟡 Heimdall Review Status

Requirement Status More Info
Reviews 🟡 0/1
Denominator calculation
Show calculation
1 if user is bot 0
1 if user is external 0
From .codeflow.yml 1
Additional review requirements
Show calculation
Max 0
0
From CODEOWNERS 0
Global minimum 0
Max 1
1
1 if commit is unverified 1
Sum 2

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@sergeypanin1994 @cb-heimdall @smirnovslava189