Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Include widgets in coverage #487

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 18, 2019
Merged

Conversation

PrimozGodec
Copy link
Collaborator

Issue

When I write a test for a widget I cannot access the coverage. I understand that the coverage for widgets was omitted since they are not well covered, but anyway it helps if one can access the coverage for widgets too.

Description of changes

With this PR I suggest including widgets in coverage. What do you think @ajdapretnar?

Includes
  • Code changes
  • Tests
  • Documentation

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #487 into master will decrease coverage by 23.9%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #487       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   85.77%   61.86%   -23.91%     
===========================================
  Files          34       59       +25     
  Lines        1996     6181     +4185     
  Branches      333      804      +471     
===========================================
+ Hits         1712     3824     +2112     
- Misses        248     2221     +1973     
- Partials       36      136      +100

@ajdapretnar
Copy link
Collaborator

I think the coverage slightly improved in these years and we should aim to improve it still. 😅
I agree with this change.

@ajdapretnar ajdapretnar merged commit c1d4b05 into biolab:master Dec 18, 2019
@PrimozGodec PrimozGodec deleted the coverage-widgets branch March 29, 2023 10:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants