Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Semantic Viewer: New widget #748

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 26, 2021
Merged

Conversation

VesnaT
Copy link
Contributor

@VesnaT VesnaT commented Nov 12, 2021

Issue
Description of changes
Includes
  • Code changes
  • Tests
  • Documentation

@VesnaT VesnaT force-pushed the semantic_viewer branch 7 times, most recently from 1b0633e to bec751e Compare November 18, 2021 13:47
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Nov 19, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #748 (2b866a9) into master (182d8a1) will increase coverage by 0.64%.
The diff coverage is 97.35%.

❗ Current head 2b866a9 differs from pull request most recent head 3a25c0e. Consider uploading reports for the commit 3a25c0e to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #748      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   74.45%   75.09%   +0.64%     
==========================================
  Files          74       75       +1     
  Lines        9896    10183     +287     
  Branches     1335     1370      +35     
==========================================
+ Hits         7368     7647     +279     
- Misses       2271     2278       +7     
- Partials      257      258       +1     

@VesnaT VesnaT force-pushed the semantic_viewer branch 2 times, most recently from cd321f8 to 71bb1d8 Compare November 25, 2021 13:00
@VesnaT VesnaT changed the title [WIP] Semantic Viewer: New widget Semantic Viewer: New widget Nov 25, 2021
@ajdapretnar
Copy link
Collaborator

This is a fantastic widget and I am wondering whether it could be adapted to also inspect topics from Topic Modeling in this way?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants