Reuse cache even if key system type given in API is not the same #1611
+4
−1
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Thanks to the PR #1478, that basically allows integration tests on our DRM logic without a real encrypted or decodable contents nor MSE/EME available, I noticed that I very recently brought a minor regression in the rewrite of the
MediaKeySystemAccess
cache reusage rules (not yet released).We relied on the
keySystems[].type
API to see if the cached one was compatible to the new wanted one, we probably wanted to compare the former with thetype
actually provided as argument to thenavigator.requestMediaKeySystemAccess
API instead (e.g.keySystems[].type
could be set just towidevine
, in which case the RxPlayer will probably ask forcom.widevine.alpha
instead).Thankfully, EME defines a
MediaKeySystemAccess.prototype.keySystem
property that seems to always be equal to the askedkeySystem
.