-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs: update picking sources and unify with patching rules #14377
docs: update picking sources and unify with patching rules #14377
Conversation
Co-authored-by: prince-chrismc <[email protected]>
they change the behavior of the library and it will no longer match the | ||
documentation or the changelog originally delivered by the authors. | ||
|
||
However, ConanCenter DOES accept **working software patches**, these patches |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
maybe, working software
needs some strict definition. as it might be too subjective what is considered working or non-working.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree -- I think it's worth revisiting this to more accurately capture the types of patches we have been seeing since this policy came out :)
|
||
## Policy about patching | ||
|
||
The main guideline in ConanCenter is to provide already compiled binaries for a set of architectures in the least surprising way as possible, so Conan |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe, least surprising way
needs some strict definition. it's not clear for newcomer what exactly does it mean.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It looks good to me! As usual, only a few suggestions. Well done! 👏
Co-authored-by: Francisco Ramírez <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: SSE4 <[email protected]>
* cleanup patches from #14377 * subfolder dont exist with new generators * styling is not enforced * move attribute to new home + fix FAQ spelling * delete out date CMake docs from older generators * move test package docs * delete empty file :) * fix links * wording + remove duplicated sections * improve mention of future work * [docs] Regenerate tables of contents Co-authored-by: prince-chrismc <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: prince-chrismc <[email protected]>
Docs!
This is the next installment of #13673 -- it's a bit bigger as I've improved some of the language trying to reflect what's currently happening in CCI
I did not touch the patching rules and exceptions as those deserve their own PR I will not accept suggestions to those please make a seperate PR 🙏