Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

ES-1705: Update .snyk bump waivers to 2024 #1373

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 30, 2023
Merged

ES-1705: Update .snyk bump waivers to 2024 #1373

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 30, 2023

Conversation

ronanbrowne
Copy link
Contributor

Bump expired waivers

@sonarqubecloud SonarQubeCloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@ronanbrowne ronanbrowne marked this pull request as ready for review November 30, 2023 15:59
@corda-jenkins-ci02
Copy link
Contributor

Jenkins build for PR 1373 build 1

Build Successful:
Jar artifact version produced by this PR: 5.0.0.765-alpha-1701359894035

@ronanbrowne ronanbrowne requested a review from a team November 30, 2023 16:40
vkolomeyko
vkolomeyko approved these changes Nov 30, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@vkolomeyko vkolomeyko left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ronanbrowne ronanbrowne merged commit eaef8fa into release/os/5.0 Nov 30, 2023
7 checks passed
@ronanbrowne ronanbrowne deleted the S-1705-Bump-snyk-waivers-for-5.0-branch branch November 30, 2023 16:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@vkolomeyko vkolomeyko vkolomeyko approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@ronanbrowne @vkolomeyko