-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 82
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Fix Migration Script for New Deployment (#908)
### Feature or Bugfix <!-- please choose --> - Bugfix ### Detail - When deploying from scratch - the migration script for byo vpc for mlstudio had a line of code `if has_table('sagemaker_studio_domain')` which was evaluating to `False` and skipping necessary migration code - Removed the `if has_table()` and just throw Exception in try/catch block for upgrade migration script - Also as part of this PR I made sure the security group gets created in the mlstudio_extension stack no matter what type of VPC we use for ML Studio Domain - Without the Security Group VpcOnly Deployments of ML Studio Domain with `security_group=[]` will never be able to connect to internet without manual changes - Tested with Imported VPC and provisioned Studio User Profile - can access internet via NAT Gateway as prescribed with VPCOnly deployments if internet access is required - Tested changes to ML Studio Domain Security Group does NOT cause new creation of Domain (only UpdateDomain no replacement) --> Environment Stack Updates Successfully ### Relates - #894 ### Security N/A Please answer the questions below briefly where applicable, or write `N/A`. Based on [OWASP 10](https://owasp.org/Top10/en/). - Does this PR introduce or modify any input fields or queries - this includes fetching data from storage outside the application (e.g. a database, an S3 bucket)? - Is the input sanitized? - What precautions are you taking before deserializing the data you consume? - Is injection prevented by parametrizing queries? - Have you ensured no `eval` or similar functions are used? - Does this PR introduce any functionality or component that requires authorization? - How have you ensured it respects the existing AuthN/AuthZ mechanisms? - Are you logging failed auth attempts? - Are you using or adding any cryptographic features? - Do you use a standard proven implementations? - Are the used keys controlled by the customer? Where are they stored? - Are you introducing any new policies/roles/users? - Have you used the least-privilege principle? How? By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
- Loading branch information
1 parent
4090107
commit ad70a88
Showing
3 changed files
with
75 additions
and
82 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters