Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consistent get_<DATA_ASSET> permissions - Dashboards #1729

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 6, 2024

Conversation

dlpzx
Copy link
Contributor

@dlpzx dlpzx commented Dec 4, 2024

Feature or Bugfix

  • Feature
  • Bugfix

Detail

This is a continuation of #1727 but for Dashboards.

  • removes GET_DASHBOARD permission check on get_dashboard
  • adds a restriction field in the Dashboard type with the restricted information
  • implement resolver to return the restricted information that checks GET_DASHBOARD permissions. Return defaults for users with no permissions
  • Adapt frontend to use the restricted fields

In addition i made some fixes in the frontend, for example, the default view I changed it to Overview because it improves the experience of a data consumer that is exploring the dashboard metadata. I also removed the forever circular progress in the viewer page if there are errors in the loading of the reader url.

Relates

Security

Please answer the questions below briefly where applicable, or write N/A. Based on
OWASP 10.

  • Does this PR introduce or modify any input fields or queries - this includes
    fetching data from storage outside the application (e.g. a database, an S3 bucket)?
    • Is the input sanitized?
    • What precautions are you taking before deserializing the data you consume?
    • Is injection prevented by parametrizing queries?
    • Have you ensured no eval or similar functions are used?
  • Does this PR introduce any functionality or component that requires authorization?
    • How have you ensured it respects the existing AuthN/AuthZ mechanisms?
    • Are you logging failed auth attempts?
  • Are you using or adding any cryptographic features?
    • Do you use a standard proven implementations?
    • Are the used keys controlled by the customer? Where are they stored?
  • Are you introducing any new policies/roles/users?
    • Have you used the least-privilege principle? How?

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@dlpzx dlpzx requested review from noah-paige, SofiaSazonova and petrkalos and removed request for noah-paige December 4, 2024 09:02
@dlpzx dlpzx force-pushed the fix/data-assets-perms2 branch 2 times, most recently from a0b897c to 31f9aa1 Compare December 4, 2024 14:20
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ const DashboardView = () => {
const fetchItem = useCallback(async () => {
setLoading(true);
const response = await client.query(getDashboard(params.uri));
if (!response.errors) {
if (response.data.getDashboard !== null) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: dispatch all errors if no data

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In the case of Dashboards if there are errors in getting the dashboard (=no data returned), the errors for the restricted information are not very relevant

@dlpzx dlpzx merged commit 9c5714b into main Dec 6, 2024
9 checks passed
dlpzx pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2024
### Feature or Bugfix
- Bugfix

### Detail
Before #1729 an unauthorized getDashboard query meant a global failure,
after #1729 it returns partial data and only raises an error for
`environment` and `restricted` fields.

```json
{'data': {'getDashboard': {'SamlGroupName': 'testGroup1',
                           'created': '2024-12-06 15:27:15.811303',
                           'dashboardUri': 'obfuscated_uri',
                           'description': 'No description provided',
                           'environment': None,
                           'label': '2024-12-06T14:57:28.249142',
                           'name': '2024-12-06t14-57-28-249142',
                           'owner': '[email protected]',
                           'restricted': None,
                           'tags': ['2024-12-06T14:57:28.249142'],
                           'terms': {'count': 0, 'nodes': []},
                           'userRoleForDashboard': 'Shared'}},
 'errors': [{'locations': [{'column': 17, 'line': 13}],
             'message': '\n'
                        '            An error occurred (UnauthorizedOperation) '
                        'when calling GET_DASHBOARD operation:\n'
                        '            User: [email protected] is not '
                        'authorized to perform: GET_DASHBOARD on resource: '
                        'obfuscated_uri\n'
                        '        ',
             'path': ['getDashboard', 'restricted']},
            {'locations': [{'column': 17, 'line': 17}],
             'message': '\n'
                        '            An error occurred (UnauthorizedOperation) '
                        'when calling GET_ENVIRONMENT operation:\n'
                        '            User: [email protected] is not '
                        'authorized to perform: GET_ENVIRONMENT on resource: '
                        'obfuscated_uri\n'
                        '        ',
             'path': ['getDashboard', 'environment']}]}
```

### Relates
Issue introduced at #1729

### Security
Please answer the questions below briefly where applicable, or write
`N/A`. Based on
[OWASP 10](https://owasp.org/Top10/en/).

- Does this PR introduce or modify any input fields or queries - this
includes
fetching data from storage outside the application (e.g. a database, an
S3 bucket)?
  - Is the input sanitized?
- What precautions are you taking before deserializing the data you
consume?
  - Is injection prevented by parametrizing queries?
  - Have you ensured no `eval` or similar functions are used?
- Does this PR introduce any functionality or component that requires
authorization?
- How have you ensured it respects the existing AuthN/AuthZ mechanisms?
  - Are you logging failed auth attempts?
- Are you using or adding any cryptographic features?
  - Do you use a standard proven implementations?
  - Are the used keys controlled by the customer? Where are they stored?
- Are you introducing any new policies/roles/users?
  - Have you used the least-privilege principle? How?


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made
under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
dlpzx added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2024
- Feature
- Bugfix

This is a continuation of
#1727 but for Dashboards.

- removes GET_DASHBOARD permission check on get_dashboard
- adds a restriction field in the Dashboard type with the restricted
information
- implement resolver to return the restricted information that checks
GET_DASHBOARD permissions. Return defaults for users with no permissions
- Adapt frontend to use the restricted fields

In addition i made some fixes in the frontend, for example, the default
view I changed it to Overview because it improves the experience of a
data consumer that is exploring the dashboard metadata. I also removed
the forever circular progress in the viewer page if there are errors in
the loading of the reader url.

- #1727

Please answer the questions below briefly where applicable, or write
`N/A`. Based on
[OWASP 10](https://owasp.org/Top10/en/).

- Does this PR introduce or modify any input fields or queries - this
includes
fetching data from storage outside the application (e.g. a database, an
S3 bucket)?
  - Is the input sanitized?
- What precautions are you taking before deserializing the data you
consume?
  - Is injection prevented by parametrizing queries?
  - Have you ensured no `eval` or similar functions are used?
- Does this PR introduce any functionality or component that requires
authorization?
- How have you ensured it respects the existing AuthN/AuthZ mechanisms?
  - Are you logging failed auth attempts?
- Are you using or adding any cryptographic features?
  - Do you use a standard proven implementations?
  - Are the used keys controlled by the customer? Where are they stored?
- Are you introducing any new policies/roles/users?
  - Have you used the least-privilege principle? How?

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made
under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
@dlpzx dlpzx mentioned this pull request Dec 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants