-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 82
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Consistent get_<DATA_ASSET> permissions - Dashboards #1729
Conversation
a0b897c
to
31f9aa1
Compare
31f9aa1
to
aa9100a
Compare
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ const DashboardView = () => { | |||
const fetchItem = useCallback(async () => { | |||
setLoading(true); | |||
const response = await client.query(getDashboard(params.uri)); | |||
if (!response.errors) { | |||
if (response.data.getDashboard !== null) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: dispatch all errors if no data
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In the case of Dashboards if there are errors in getting the dashboard (=no data returned), the errors for the restricted information are not very relevant
### Feature or Bugfix - Bugfix ### Detail Before #1729 an unauthorized getDashboard query meant a global failure, after #1729 it returns partial data and only raises an error for `environment` and `restricted` fields. ```json {'data': {'getDashboard': {'SamlGroupName': 'testGroup1', 'created': '2024-12-06 15:27:15.811303', 'dashboardUri': 'obfuscated_uri', 'description': 'No description provided', 'environment': None, 'label': '2024-12-06T14:57:28.249142', 'name': '2024-12-06t14-57-28-249142', 'owner': '[email protected]', 'restricted': None, 'tags': ['2024-12-06T14:57:28.249142'], 'terms': {'count': 0, 'nodes': []}, 'userRoleForDashboard': 'Shared'}}, 'errors': [{'locations': [{'column': 17, 'line': 13}], 'message': '\n' ' An error occurred (UnauthorizedOperation) ' 'when calling GET_DASHBOARD operation:\n' ' User: [email protected] is not ' 'authorized to perform: GET_DASHBOARD on resource: ' 'obfuscated_uri\n' ' ', 'path': ['getDashboard', 'restricted']}, {'locations': [{'column': 17, 'line': 17}], 'message': '\n' ' An error occurred (UnauthorizedOperation) ' 'when calling GET_ENVIRONMENT operation:\n' ' User: [email protected] is not ' 'authorized to perform: GET_ENVIRONMENT on resource: ' 'obfuscated_uri\n' ' ', 'path': ['getDashboard', 'environment']}]} ``` ### Relates Issue introduced at #1729 ### Security Please answer the questions below briefly where applicable, or write `N/A`. Based on [OWASP 10](https://owasp.org/Top10/en/). - Does this PR introduce or modify any input fields or queries - this includes fetching data from storage outside the application (e.g. a database, an S3 bucket)? - Is the input sanitized? - What precautions are you taking before deserializing the data you consume? - Is injection prevented by parametrizing queries? - Have you ensured no `eval` or similar functions are used? - Does this PR introduce any functionality or component that requires authorization? - How have you ensured it respects the existing AuthN/AuthZ mechanisms? - Are you logging failed auth attempts? - Are you using or adding any cryptographic features? - Do you use a standard proven implementations? - Are the used keys controlled by the customer? Where are they stored? - Are you introducing any new policies/roles/users? - Have you used the least-privilege principle? How? By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
- Feature - Bugfix This is a continuation of #1727 but for Dashboards. - removes GET_DASHBOARD permission check on get_dashboard - adds a restriction field in the Dashboard type with the restricted information - implement resolver to return the restricted information that checks GET_DASHBOARD permissions. Return defaults for users with no permissions - Adapt frontend to use the restricted fields In addition i made some fixes in the frontend, for example, the default view I changed it to Overview because it improves the experience of a data consumer that is exploring the dashboard metadata. I also removed the forever circular progress in the viewer page if there are errors in the loading of the reader url. - #1727 Please answer the questions below briefly where applicable, or write `N/A`. Based on [OWASP 10](https://owasp.org/Top10/en/). - Does this PR introduce or modify any input fields or queries - this includes fetching data from storage outside the application (e.g. a database, an S3 bucket)? - Is the input sanitized? - What precautions are you taking before deserializing the data you consume? - Is injection prevented by parametrizing queries? - Have you ensured no `eval` or similar functions are used? - Does this PR introduce any functionality or component that requires authorization? - How have you ensured it respects the existing AuthN/AuthZ mechanisms? - Are you logging failed auth attempts? - Are you using or adding any cryptographic features? - Do you use a standard proven implementations? - Are the used keys controlled by the customer? Where are they stored? - Are you introducing any new policies/roles/users? - Have you used the least-privilege principle? How? By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
Feature or Bugfix
Detail
This is a continuation of #1727 but for Dashboards.
In addition i made some fixes in the frontend, for example, the default view I changed it to Overview because it improves the experience of a data consumer that is exploring the dashboard metadata. I also removed the forever circular progress in the viewer page if there are errors in the loading of the reader url.
Relates
Security
Please answer the questions below briefly where applicable, or write
N/A
. Based onOWASP 10.
fetching data from storage outside the application (e.g. a database, an S3 bucket)?
eval
or similar functions are used?By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.