Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 12, 2024. It is now read-only.

updates sticky message #11

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 24, 2024
Merged

updates sticky message #11

merged 2 commits into from
May 24, 2024

Conversation

jpvajda
Copy link
Contributor

@jpvajda jpvajda commented May 23, 2024

Updates sticky message to encourage discussions in channel

Copy link
Collaborator

@lukeocodes lukeocodes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Much better!

@jpvajda jpvajda merged commit 3fcc9c0 into main May 24, 2024
5 checks passed
@jpvajda jpvajda deleted the sticky-message-change branch May 24, 2024 16:22
lukeocodes pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2024
* updates sticky message (#11)

* updates sticky message

* resolves failed lint check

* fix: get the thread autoresponding working

---------

Co-authored-by: John Vajda (JV) <[email protected]>
lukeocodes pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2024
* updates sticky message (#11)

* updates sticky message

* resolves failed lint check

* fix: suppress errors when fetching sticky

We don't need to care if the sticky message got deleted some other
way. As such, failing to fetch the message should not bubble up
and block the process. So we can swallow those errors and
proceed with the rest of the logic.

---------

Co-authored-by: John Vajda (JV) <[email protected]>
lukeocodes added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2024
* feat: adding event listeners for relevant events (#8)

* feat: adding event listeners for relevant events

* feat: adding event listeners for relevant events

---------

Co-authored-by: Vaibhav Rai <[email protected]>

* Refactor: Make error handling rock solid (#10)

* fix: get the thread autoresponding working (#12)

* updates sticky message (#11)

* updates sticky message

* resolves failed lint check

* fix: get the thread autoresponding working

---------

Co-authored-by: John Vajda (JV) <[email protected]>

* fix: suppress errors when fetching sticky (#13)

* updates sticky message (#11)

* updates sticky message

* resolves failed lint check

* fix: suppress errors when fetching sticky

We don't need to care if the sticky message got deleted some other
way. As such, failing to fetch the message should not bubble up
and block the process. So we can swallow those errors and
proceed with the rest of the logic.

---------

Co-authored-by: John Vajda (JV) <[email protected]>

---------

Co-authored-by: Vaibhav Rai <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Naomi <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: John Vajda (JV) <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants